Citation network
Zahn Vs. International Paper Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 17, 1973
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
Zahn v. InternationalSearch
-
Paper Co. - 414 U.S. 291 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court Zahn v. InternationalSearch
-
Paper Co., 414 U.S. 291 (1973) Zahn v. InternationalSearch
-
action must satisfy the jurisdictional amount and any plaintiff who does not must be dismissed from the case. Snyder v. HarrisSearch
-
Reading Snyder v. HarrisSearch
-
Vt.1971). A divided Court of Appeals affirmed, 469 F.2d 1033 (CA2 1972), principally on the authority of Snyder v. HarrisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
forbid aggregation of claims where none of the claimants satisfies the jurisdictional amount, as was the case in Scott v. FrazierSearch
-
amount, even though other litigants assert claims sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the federal court. Clark v. PaulSearch
-
U. S. 341 , 109 U. S. 355 (1883). In Clark v. PaulSearch
-
Steele v. GuarantySearch
-
for the Advisory Committee, was a principal architect of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. That case, Hackner v. GuarantySearch
-
as it applied to class actions under Rule 23 reached this Court in Snyder v. HarrisSearch
-
the jurisdictional amount necessary for instituting suit in the federal courts. None of the plaintiffs in Snyder v. HarrisSearch
-
allege jurisdictionally sufficient claims. This follows inescapably from the Court's heavy reliance on Clark v. PaulSearch
-
Moreover, Page 414 U. S. 301 the Court cited with approval the decision in Alvarez v. PanSearch
-
F.2d at 1035. Neither are we inclined to overrule Snyder v. HarrisSearch
-
The Court declined a like invitation in Snyder v. HarrisSearch
-
claims in excess of the specified jurisdictional amount. At this time, we have no good reason to disagree with Snyder v. HarrisSearch
-
themselves or in the official commentaries. But we find not a trace to this effect. As the Court thought in Snyder v. HarrisSearch
-
Waite v. SantaSearch
-
U. S. 341 , 109 U. S. 355 (1883). Cf. Clay v. FieldSearch
-
Pet. 143 (1832). Snyder v. HarrisSearch
-
to bar aggregation of separate and distinct claims dated back to at least Oliver v. AlexanderSearch
-
to bring an appeal to this Court. See, e.g., Stewart v. DunhamSearch
-
of our appellate jurisdiction was applied to the jurisdictional amount requirement for federal trial courts in Walter v. NortheasternSearch
-
Rogers v. HennepinSearch
-
Title Guaranty Co. v. AllenSearch
-
Clark v. PaulSearch
-
Alfonso v. HillsboroughSearch
-
Troup v. McCartSearch
-
Hughes v. EncyclopaediaSearch
-
Ames v. MengelSearch
-
Miller v. NationalSearch
-
Matlaw Corp. v. WarSearch
-
Sturgeon v. GreatSearch
-
Black & Yates, Inc. v. MahoganySearch
-
Woerter v. OrrSearch
-
Central Mexico Light & Power Co. v. MunchSearch
-
Independence Shares Corp. v. DeckertSearch
-
Ames v. ChestnutSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Zahn v. InternationalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial