Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Laird Vs. Tatum

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 01, 1972

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

64 entries 5 linked 59 unlinked
Show
  1. Dunbar Vs. Dunbar US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1903
  2. Glidden Vs. Harrington US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1903
  3. Branzburg Vs. Hayes US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1972
  4. Mcgrath Vs. Kristensen US Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1950
  5. West Coast Hotel Co. Vs. Parrish US Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1937
    Distinguished
  6. U.S. 824 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Laird v. Tatum
    Search
  7. U.S. 824 (1972) Laird v. Tatum
    Search
  8. Hearings, p. 619. There is one reference to the case of Tatum v. Laird
    Search
  9. However, in connection with the case of Tatum v. Laird
    Search
  10. my second appearance. My recollection is that the first time I learned of the existence of the case of Laird v. Tatum
    Search
  11. contain a copy. I would expect such a memorandum to have commented on the decision of the Court of Appeals in Laird v. Tatum
    Search
  12. in the district court, in the court of appeals, or in this Court, in the government's conduct of the case of Laird v. Tatum
    Search
  13. Since I have neither been of counsel nor have I been a material witness in Laird v. Tatum
    Search
  14. I agree. In both United States v. United
    Search
  15. Page 409 U. S. 829 but with respect to which I assisted in drafting the brief, and in S & E Contractors v. United
    Search
  16. the litigation, I disqualified myself. Since I did not have even an advisory role in the conduct of the case of Laird v. Tatum
    Search
  17. of Justice have treated the same or very Page 409 U. S. 830 similar situations differently. In Schneiderman v. United
    Search
  18. concluding that my total lack of connection while in the Department of Justice with the defense of the case of Laird v. Tatum
    Search
  19. Cong., 1st Sess. (1937). Nonetheless, he sat in the case which upheld the constitutionality of that Act, United States v. Darby
    Search
  20. U. S. 100 (1941), and in later cases construing it, including Jewel Ridge Coal Corp. v. Local
    Search
  21. disputes. Yet in addition to sitting in one of the leading cases interpreting the scope of the Act, United States v. Hutcheson
    Search
  22. U. S. 219 (1941), Justice Frankfurter wrote the Court's opinion. Justice Jackson, in McGrath v. Kristensen
    Search
  23. he discussed at some length the doctrine expounded in the case of Adkins v. Children's
    Search
  24. See pp. 205, 209-211. Nine years later, Chief Justice Hughes authored the Court's opinion in West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
    Search
  25. propensities. Mr. Justice Douglas' statement about federal district judges in his dissenting opinion in Chandler v. Judicial
    Search
  26. Court should disqualify himself for that reason. See, e.g., the opinion of Mr. Justice Harlan, joining in Lewis v. Manufacturers
    Search
  27. Court of Massachusetts rendered, with his participation while he was Chief Justice of that court. See Worcester v. Worcester
    Search
  28. and Williams v. Parker
    Search
  29. has a duty to sit where not disqualified which is equally as strong as the duty to not sit where disqualified. Edwards v. United
    Search
  30. Tynan v. United
    Search
  31. Wolfson v. Palmieri
    Search
  32. Simmons v. United
    Search
  33. United States v. Hoffa
    Search
  34. Tucker v. Kerner
    Search
  35. Walker v. Bishop
    Search
  36. review an equally divided decision of this Court and thereby establish the law for our jurisdiction. See, e.g., Tinker v. Des
    Search
  37. See denial of petition for rehearing in Jewel Ridge Coal Corp. v. Local
    Search
  38. U. S. 665 (1972), In re Pappas, and United States v. Caldwell
    Search
  39. U. S. 665 . Gelbard v. United
    Search
  40. States and United States v. Egan
    Search
  41. Vanderburgh Airport Authority District v. Delta
    Search
  42. Airlines Inc., 405 U. S. 726 (1972), and Northeast Airlines Inc. v. New
    Search
  43. Petitioners in Gravel v. United
    Search
  44. as it relates to disqualification, verges on the frivolous. While my peripheral advisory role in New York Times Co. v. United
    Search
  45. U.S. Supreme Court Laird v. Tatum
    Search
  46. of Tatum v. Laird
    Search
  47. of Laird v. Tatum
    Search
  48. United States v. United
    Search
  49. S & E Contractors v. United
    Search
  50. In Schneiderman v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial