Citation network
Lego Vs. Twomey
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 12, 1972
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 477 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Lego v. TwomeySearch
-
U.S. 477 (1972) Lego v. TwomeySearch
-
Petitioner also urges that, even though the trial judge ruled on his coercion claim, he was entitled, under Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
The hearing on the voluntariness of a confession required by this Court's decision in Jackson v. DennoSearch
-
confession was, in fact, voluntarily given, and not the outcome of coercion which the Constitution forbids. Jackson v. DennoSearch
-
On direct appeal, the Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the conviction. People v. LegoSearch
-
that Lego had no state remedy then available to him, and denied relief on the merits. United States ex rel. Lego v. PateSearch
-
is designed to enhance the reliability of jury verdicts. To judge whether that is so, we must return to Jackson v. DennoSearch
-
in whole or in part, upon an involuntary confession, without regard for the truth or falsity of the confession, Rogers v. RichmondSearch
-
U. S. 534 , and even though there is ample evidence aside from the confession to support the conviction. Malinski v. NewSearch
-
on the issue of voluntariness, a determination uninfluenced by the truth or falsity of the confession. Rogers v. RichmondSearch
-
whether true or false, is forbidden because the method used to extract them offends constitutional principles. Rogers v. RichmondSearch
-
doubt in order to give adequate protection to those values that exclusionary rules are designed to serve. Jackson v. DennoSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
supra, an offspring of Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
U. S. 278 (1936), requires judicial rulings on voluntariness prior to admitting confessions. Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
flowing from custodial interrogations unless adequate warnings were administered and a waiver was obtained. Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 232 U. S. 383 (1914), and Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment has been excluded from federal criminal trials for many years. Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra. The same is true of coerced confessions offered in either federal or state trials. Bram v. UnitedSearch
-
Brown v. MississippiSearch
-
that a jury is better suited than a judge to determine voluntariness, it, questions the basic assumptions of Jackson v. DennoSearch
-
that the Constitution requires submission of voluntariness claims to a jury as well as a judge. Finally, Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
by a preponderance of the evidence or to the satisfaction of the court or proof of voluntariness in fact. E.g., Duncan v. StateSearch
-
State v. DillonSearch
-
People v. HarperSearch
-
State v. MilowSearch
-
Barnhart v. StateSearch
-
Commonwealth v. WhiteSearch
-
State v. NolanSearch
-
State v. WhiteSearch
-
State v. BrewtonSearch
-
Butler v. RundleSearch
-
Monts v. StateSearch
-
State v. DavisSearch
-
Other States, using state law or not specifying a basis, require proof beyond a reasonable doubt. E.g., State v. RagdaleSearch
-
State v. KeiserSearch
-
State v. YoughSearch
-
People v. HuntleySearch
-
State v. ThundershieldSearch
-
Goodchild v. BurkeSearch
-
have held as an exercise of supervisory power that voluntariness must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Ralph v. WardenSearch
-
F.2d 786, 793 (CA4 1970), clarifying United States v. InmanSearch
-
Pea v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SchipaniSearch
-
Illinois followed what we described in Jackson v. DennoSearch
-
People v. WagonerSearch
-
People v. ThomlisonSearch
-
the right to adjudicate his federal claims or deliberately bypassed state procedures for testing those claims. Cf. Fay v. NoiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial