Citation network
Fpc Vs. Florida Power and Light Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 12, 1972
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
FPC v. FloridaSearch
-
Power & Light Co. - 404 U.S. 453 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. FloridaSearch
-
Power & Light Co., 404 U.S. 453 (1972) Federal Power Commission v. FloridaSearch
-
Power Co. v. PageSearch
-
FPC v. SouthernSearch
-
from a utility in Rhode Island to a utility in Massachusetts is in interstate commerce. See Public Utilities Comm'n v. AttleboroSearch
-
United States v. PublicSearch
-
by giving the FPC jurisdiction over direct exchanges. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. FPCSearch
-
could be shown to be sometimes no more than a funnel. In Page 404 U. S. 459 Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. FPCSearch
-
b). See Gainesville Utilities Dept. v. FloridaSearch
-
of Page 404 U. S. 466 technical matters, that we do not consider it fairly in dispute. See, e.g., FPC v. SouthernSearch
-
Travelers' Indemnity Co. v. ParkersburgSearch
-
Chapman v. FPCSearch
-
b). Thus, state jurisdiction is clearly demarcated and preserved. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. FPCSearch
-
Railroad Comm'n of Wisconsin v. ChicagoSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
type tracing studies become less feasible as interconnections grow more complicated. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. FPCSearch
-
Corp was before this Court in Gainesville Utilities Dept. v. FloridaSearch
-
Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. FPCSearch
-
U. S. 515 , 324 U. S. 536 . See also Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. FPCSearch
-
This argument is developed by the dissent in Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. FPCSearch
-
See principally Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. FPCSearch
-
Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. FPCSearch
-
Public Service Co. of Indiana v. FPCSearch
-
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. FPCSearch
-
Folkes v. ChaddSearch
-
Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. FPCSearch
-
of electric power involved in the instant case. See Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. FPCSearch
-
Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. FPCSearch
-
different result -- that no actual interstate flow of FPL power had occurred. Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. FPCSearch
-
the Commission has not undertaken that phase of regulation. The case is therefore unlike Pennsylvana Water & Power Co. v. FPCSearch
-
The decision of the Supreme Court in Public Utilities Commission v. AttleboroSearch
-
transmissions not made by prearrangement or in case of wholesale transactions. In Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. FPCSearch
-
Public Utilities Comm'n v. AttleboroSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. FloridaSearch
-
Federal Power Commission v. FloridaSearch
-
In Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. PageSearch
-
See Public Utilities Comm'n v. AttleboroSearch
-
See Gainesville Utilities Dept. v. FloridaSearch
-
Chapman v. FPCSearch
-
Gainesville Utilities Dept. v. FloridaSearch
-
Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. FPCSearch
-
See Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. FPCSearch
-
Pennsylvana Water & Power Co. v. FPCSearch
-
Public Utilities Commission v. AttleboroSearch
-
In Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. FPCSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial