Citation network
Lindsey Vs. Normet
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 23, 1972
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 56 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Lindsey v. NormetSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 56 (1972) Lindsey v. NormetSearch
-
U. S. 156 , 287 U. S. 168 (1932). See also Nickey v. MississippiSearch
-
same factual situation that may assert valid legal or equitable defenses or counterclaims. In Grant Timber & Mfg. Co. v. GraySearch
-
In Bianchi v. MoralesSearch
-
U. S. 425 (1961), or if the objective itself is beyond the State's power to achieve, Gomillion v. LightfootSearch
-
Smith v. ReederSearch
-
Entelman v. HagoodSearch
-
Taylor v. ScottSearch
-
entitled to twice the rents accruing during the appeal, without proof of actual damage in that amount. See Priester v. ThrallSearch
-
Ore. 184, 187, 349 P.2d 866, 868 (1960). In Scales v. SpencerSearch
-
the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not require a State to provide appellate review, Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
Ohio v. AkronSearch
-
some litigants and capriciously or arbitrarily denied to others without violating the Equal Protection Clause. Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
Long v. DistrictSearch
-
U. S. 367 (1969). Cf. Coppedge v. UnitedSearch
-
Ellis v. UnitedSearch
-
here reasonable procedural provisions to safeguard litigated property, cf. National Union of Marine Cooks & Stewards v. ArnoldSearch
-
created doctrine of abstention involves duplication of effort and expense and an attendant delay, see England v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 241 , 389 U. S. 248 (1967) (citing Popper v. ClarkSearch
-
U. S. 472 , 337 U. S. 492 (1949)). See Reetz v. BozanichSearch
-
United States v. NationalSearch
-
Oregon also recognizes certain equitable defenses in FED actions, see Leathers v. PetersonSearch
-
Crossen v. CampbellSearch
-
Friedenthal v. ThompsonSearch
-
Menefee Lumber Co. v. AbramSearch
-
Grant Timber & Mfg. Co. v. GraySearch
-
Brown v. SouthallSearch
-
For recognition of an implied warranty of habitability, see Pine v. PerssionSearch
-
Earl Millikin, Inc. v. AllenSearch
-
Edwards v. HabibSearch
-
United States v. BruceSearch
-
United States v. BeatySearch
-
property by the exertion of force against the person of an actual occupant who opposes and resists such entry. Cohlan v. MillerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lindsey v. NormetSearch
-
Nickey v. MississippiSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial