Citation network
Roudebush Vs. Hartke
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 23, 1972
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 15 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Roudebush v. HartkeSearch
-
U.S. 15 (1972) Roudebush v. HartkeSearch
-
In the case of Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
Together with No. 70-67, Sendak, Attorney General of Indiana v. HartkeSearch
-
See Reed v. CountySearch
-
See Powell v. McCormackSearch
-
Toucey v. NewSearch
-
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
See Hill v. MartinSearch
-
courts in this connection is not unlike that of the state court in the case of Public Service Co. of Northern Illinois v. CorboySearch
-
Central Electric & Gas Co. v. CitySearch
-
Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. MartinSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
F.Supp. 82, aff'd sub nom. Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. MartinSearch
-
Weil v. CalhounSearch
-
Court cited three cases decided by the Indiana Supreme Court as authority for its rulings. State ex rel. Batchelet v. DekalbSearch
-
Beaman v. CircuitSearch
-
Acker v. ReevesSearch
-
the qualifications of its members is limited to the qualifications expressly set forth in the Constitution. Powell v. McCormackSearch
-
Senate itself has recounted the votes in close elections in States where there was no recount procedure. E.g., O'Conor v. MarkeySearch
-
to earlier assumptions, Steck had won. Accordingly, Brookhart was replaced by Steck as a Senator from Iowa. See Steck v. BrookhartSearch
-
Expulsion and Censure Cases from 1789 to 1960, S.Doc. No. 71, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., 116-117 (1962). See also Hurley v. ChavezSearch
-
Sweeney v. KilgoreSearch
-
O'Conor v. MarkeySearch
-
Willis v. VanSearch
-
Bursum v. BrattonSearch
-
to the Senate of the decision whether Hartke or Roudebush received more lawful votes. Our case law agrees. Both Barry v. CunninghamSearch
-
U. S. 597 , and Reed v. CountySearch
-
U.S. at 277 U. S. 388 . In Barry v. CunninghamSearch
-
Barry v. CunninghamSearch
-
recount, alter the outcome of the election -- a principle that has been widely recognized by state courts. See Laxalt v. CannonSearch
-
the Houses of Congress may not engraft qualifications for membership beyond those already contained in Art. I, Powell v. McCormackSearch
-
of the courts is to protect the Senate's exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter, as did this Court in Barry v. CunninghamSearch
-
Several areas of decisionmaking are immune from judicial review by federal courts. The cases are reviewed in Baker v. CarrSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Roudebush v. HartkeSearch
-
of Prentis v. AtlanticSearch
-
Sendak, Attorney General of Indiana v. HartkeSearch
-
of Public Service Co. of Northern Illinois v. CorboySearch
-
Central Electric & Gas Co. v. CitySearch
-
Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. MartinSearch
-
Batchelet v. DekalbSearch
-
Beaman v. CircuitSearch
-
Acker v. ReevesSearch
-
the Constitution. Powell v. McCormackSearch
-
E.g., O'Conor v. MarkeySearch
-
Iowa. See Steck v. BrookhartSearch
-
Hurley v. ChavezSearch
-
Both Barry v. CunninghamSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial