Citation network
Swarb Vs. Lennox
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 24, 1972
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 191 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Swarb v. LennoxSearch
-
U.S. 191 (1972) Swarb v. LennoxSearch
-
waived the rights he would possess if the document he signed had contained no cognovit provision. D. H. Overmyer Co. v. FrickSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal, heard as a companion to D. H. Overmyer Co. v. FrickSearch
-
It has been said that his power is derived from the instrument under which he acts, and not from his office, Smith v. SafeguardSearch
-
Co., 212 Pa.Super. 83, 87, 239 A.2d 824, 826 (1968), and that his entry of judgment is a ministerial act, Lenson v. SandlerSearch
-
Equipment Corp. of America v. PrimosSearch
-
Cook v. GilbertSearch
-
Hatch v. StittSearch
-
and its lien remain. The pervasive and drastic character of the Pennsylvania system has been noted. Cutler Corp. v. LatshawSearch
-
Pa. 1, 4-5, 97 A.2d 234, 236 (1953). See Kine v. FormanSearch
-
Page 405 U. S. 196 404 Pa. 301, 172 A.2d 164 (1961), and Atlas Credit Corp. v. EzrineSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Compare the result reached with respect to the Delaware system in Osmond v. SpenceSearch
-
that portion of the District Court's judgment from which no appeal or cross-appeal was taken. Morley Construction Co. v. MarylandSearch
-
United States v. RainesSearch
-
appeal to entitle him to support the judgment in his favor on grounds expressly rejected by the court below. Walling v. GeneralSearch
-
United States v. AmericanSearch
-
and the Court may notice a plain error in the record that disposes of a judgment before it. Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
We have remanded for reconsideration in light of a confession of error. In Young v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 315 U. S. 258 -259. As we stated in Sibron v. NewSearch
-
Page 405 U. S. 206 That is the practice in civil cases also. Cates v. HaderleinSearch
-
the lower court's judgment not challenged by the appeal. As stated by Mr. Justice Cardozo in Morley Construction Co. v. MarylandSearch
-
Cf. California Welfare Rights Organization v. SuperiorSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Swarb v. LennoxSearch
-
D. H. Overmyer Co. v. FrickSearch
-
Smith v. SafeguardSearch
-
Lenson v. SandlerSearch
-
Cutler Corp. v. LatshawSearch
-
See Kine v. FormanSearch
-
and Atlas Credit Corp. v. EzrineSearch
-
Osmond v. SpenceSearch
-
Morley Construction Co. v. MarylandSearch
-
Walling v. GeneralSearch
-
Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
In Young v. UnitedSearch
-
Sibron v. NewSearch
-
Cates v. HaderleinSearch
-
Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial