Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Bullock Vs. Carter

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 24, 1972

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

45 entries 11 linked 34 unlinked
Show
  1. Nixon Vs. Herndon US Supreme Court · Mar 07, 1927
  2. Evans Vs. Cornman US Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1970
  3. Carrington Vs. Rash US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1965
  4. Williams Vs. Rhodes US Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1968
  5. Smith Vs. Cahoon US Supreme Court · May 25, 1931
  6. Mcgowan Vs. Maryland US Supreme Court · May 29, 1961
  7. Snowden Vs. Hughes US Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1944
  8. Wesberry Vs. Sanders US Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1964
  9. Jenness Vs. Fortson US Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1971
  10. Morey Vs. Doud US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1957
  11. Nixon Vs. Condon US Supreme Court · May 02, 1932
  12. U.S. 134 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Bullock v. Carter
    Search
  13. U.S. 134 (1972) Bullock v. Carter
    Search
  14. within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. Gray v. Sanders
    Search
  15. be exercised in a manner consistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. See, e.g., Williams v. Rhodes
    Search
  16. or whether it must withstand a more rigid standard of review. In Harper v. Virginia
    Search
  17. or incidental burden on the exercise of voting rights is subject to a stringent standard of review. McDonald v. Board
    Search
  18. which voters might choose. The existence of such barriers does not, of itself, compel close scrutiny. Compare Jenness v. Fortson
    Search
  19. U. S. 431 (1971), with Williams v. Rhodes
    Search
  20. has recognized that a State has a legitimate interest in regulating the number of candidates on the ballot. Jenness v. Fortson
    Search
  21. if not a duty, to protect the integrity of its political processes from frivolous or fraudulent candidacies. Jenness v. Fortson
    Search
  22. the criterion for differing treatment must bear some relevance to the object of the legislation. Morey v. Doud
    Search
  23. validity of a state law distinguishing between political parties on the basis of success in prior elections. Jenness v. Fortson
    Search
  24. Appellants ask the Court to reconsider the scope of Smith v. Allwright
    Search
  25. Terry v. Adams
    Search
  26. Nixon v. Condon
    Search
  27. law, rather than action by a political party, and thus have no occasion to consider the scope of the holding in Smith v. Allwright
    Search
  28. did not ultimately prevail in this action. See n 3, supra. We take note of the fact that, in Johnson v. Luna
    Search
  29. See Dandridge v. Williams
    Search
  30. Cf. Turner v. Fouche
    Search
  31. See Harper v. Virginia
    Search
  32. Kramer v. Union
    Search
  33. Cipriano v. City
    Search
  34. See Reynolds v. Sims
    Search
  35. Cf. Harper v. Virginia
    Search
  36. See Carter v. Dies
    Search
  37. U.S. Supreme Court Bullock v. Carter
    Search
  38. of the Fourteenth Amendment. Gray v. Sanders
    Search
  39. In Harper v. Virginia
    Search
  40. McDonald v. Board
    Search
  41. Compare Jenness v. Fortson
    Search
  42. of Smith v. Allwright
    Search
  43. Terry v. Adams
    Search
  44. Smith v. Allwright
    Search
  45. Johnson v. Luna
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial