Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Monger Vs. Florida

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 28, 1972

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 5 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. Mckane Vs. Durston US Supreme Court · May 14, 1894
  2. Burns Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1959
  3. GriffIn Vs. Illinois US Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1956
  4. Davis Vs. Wechsler US Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1923
  5. Naacp Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Jun 08, 1959
  6. U.S. 958 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Monger v. Florida
    Search
  7. U.S. 958 (1972) Monger v. Florida
    Search
  8. no requirement that a state provide appellate courts, or even that there be a right to appellate review. Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  9. or capriciously without violating the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Douglas v. California
    Search
  10. the First Amendment are rejected on the basis of procedural technicalities such as the one involved here. See Daniels v. Allen
    Search
  11. Faris Trust & Sav. Co. v. Hill
    Search
  12. Rogers v. Alabama
    Search
  13. founded upon state grounds is subject to exception so that federal claims may properly be vindicated. In Rogers v. Alabama
    Search
  14. federal questions which had been avoided by state courts on the ground that the improper remedy had been used, NAACP v. Alabama
    Search
  15. the argument advanced had been too indefinite or was improperly presented for consideration by the state court, Barr v. City
    Search
  16. Staub v. City
    Search
  17. Lovell v. Griffin
    Search
  18. had failed to give opposing counsel the requisite opportunity to examine and correct the transcript, Sullivan v. Little
    Search
  19. that a criminal defendant had not made timely objection to the admission of evidence, Henry v. Mississippi
    Search
  20. U. S. 443 , or that the required certification of the state appeal had not been obtained, Parrot v. City
    Search
  21. Note, 62 Col.L.Rev. 822 (1962). In Henry v. Mississippi
    Search
  22. or had the petitioner waited until January 18 to file his formal notice of appeal. Under such circumstances, Henry v. Mississippi
    Search
  23. petitioner's federal claims. I would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and reverse and remand on Redrup v. New
    Search
  24. judge district court, Meyer v. Austin
    Search
  25. F.Supp. 457, and an appeal from that judgment is presently pending before this Court, Austin v. Meyer
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Monger v. Florida
    Search
  27. the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Douglas v. California
    Search
  28. See Daniels v. Allen
    Search
  29. In Rogers v. Alabama
    Search
  30. Barr v. City
    Search
  31. Sullivan v. Little
    Search
  32. Parrot v. City
    Search
  33. In Henry v. Mississippi
    Search
  34. Redrup v. New
    Search
  35. Meyer v. Austin
    Search
  36. Court, Austin v. Meyer
    Search
  37. Henry v. Mississippi
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial