Citation network
illinois Vs. City of Milwaukee
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 24, 1972
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Illinois v. CitySearch
-
of Milwaukee - 406 U.S. 91 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Illinois v. CitySearch
-
of Milwaukee, 406 U.S. 91 (1972) Illinois v. CitySearch
-
Utah v. UnitedSearch
-
use of our original jurisdiction so that our increasing duties with the appellate docket will not suffer. Washington v. GeneralSearch
-
pleadings, be attributed to a State so as to warrant a joinder of the State as party defendant. In Missouri v. IllinoisSearch
-
It is state action and its results that are complained of -- thus distinguishing this case from that of Louisiana v. TexasSearch
-
U.S. at 180 U. S. 242 . In New York v. NewSearch
-
U.S. at 256 U. S. 302 . The most recent case is New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
Bullard v. CitySearch
-
Page 406 U. S. 98 Cowles v. MercerSearch
-
a). See Glenwood Light & Water Co. v. MutualSearch
-
Missouri R. Co. v. WardSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Ronzio v. DenverSearch
-
a) includes suits brought by a State. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, speaking for the four members of this Court in Romero v. InternationalSearch
-
Citations omitted.) Lower courts have reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Murphy v. ColonialSearch
-
Stokes v. AdairSearch
-
Mater v. HolleySearch
-
of the Division of Jurisdiction Between State and Federal Courts 180-182 (1969). Judge Harvey M. Johnsen, in Texas v. PankeySearch
-
Chief Judge Lumbard, speaking for the panel in Ivy Broadcasting Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
its natural meaning, see Romero v. InternationalSearch
-
a), Ames v. KansasSearch
-
sewage, Rivers and Harbors Act of March 3, 1899, 30 Stat. 1121, a grant of power which we construed in United States v. RepublicSearch
-
Steel Corp., 362 U. S. 482 , and in United States v. StandardSearch
-
Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
as Texas v. PankeySearch
-
The leading air case is Georgia v. TennesseeSearch
-
sort, on the part of a State, for relief from injuries analogous to torts, must be examined, is dwelt upon in Missouri v. IllinoisSearch
-
and the alternative to force is a suit in this court. Missouri v. IllinoisSearch
-
Ibid. In speaking of the problem of apportioning the waters of an interstate stream, the Court said in Kansas v. ColoradoSearch
-
Texas v. NewSearch
-
Texas v. FloridaSearch
-
of the waters of an interstate stream has often been made under the head of our original jurisdiction. Nebraska v. WyomingSearch
-
Arizona v. CaliforniaSearch
-
New York v. NewSearch
-
New Jersey v. NewSearch
-
York City, 283 U. S. 473 , 283 U. S. 481 , 482. In Missouri v. IllinoisSearch
-
consideration of state standards may be relevant. Cf. Connecticut v. MassachusettsSearch
-
citizens of different States for the purposes of diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. AlabamaSearch
-
The contrary indication in Ohio v. WyandotteSearch
-
provide useful guidelines in fashioning such rules of decision. What we said in another connection in Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
Thus, it is not only the character of the parties that requires us to apply federal law. See Georgia v. TennesseeSearch
-
Wisconsin v. PelicanSearch
-
The Federalist No. 80 (A. Hamilton). As Mr. Justice Harlan indicated for the Court in Banco Nacional de Cuba v. SabbatinoSearch
-
controversy touches basic interests of federalism, we have fashioned federal common law. See also Clearfield Trust Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. FederalSearch
-
fact that the Hinderlider case was written by Mr. Justice Brandeis, who also wrote for the Court in Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
In North Dakota v. MinnesotaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial