Citation network
Adams Vs. Williams
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 12, 1972
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 143 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
U.S. 143 (1972) Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
As Terry v. OhioSearch
-
aside. Since we conclude that the policeman's actions here conformed to the standards this Court laid down in Terry v. OhioSearch
-
or some corroboration of the tip, the policeman's actions were unreasonable under the standards set forth in Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Gaines v. CravenSearch
-
United States v. UnverzagtSearch
-
informant's unverified tip may have been insufficient for a narcotics arrest or search warrant, see, e.g., Spinelli v. UnitedSearch
-
was reasonable. The loaded gun seized as a result of this intrusion was therefore admissible at Williams' trial. Terry v. OhioSearch
-
same type of specific evidence of each element of the offense as would be needed to support a conviction. See Draper v. UnitedSearch
-
Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
by probable cause, and the search of his person and of the car incident to that arrest was lawful. See Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
is no reason why all pistols should not be barred to everyone except the police. The leading case is United States v. MillerSearch
-
the Second rather than the Fourth Amendment. I share with Judge Friendly a concern that the easy extension of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
F.2d at 39, quoting Terry v. OhioSearch
-
In Draper v. UnitedSearch
-
JUSTICE MARSHALL, with whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS joins, dissenting. Four years have passed since we decided Terry v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 1 (1968), and its companion cases, Sibron v. NewSearch
-
York and Peters v. NewSearch
-
Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
cannot be justified on the basis of conclusory allegations of an unnamed informant who is allegedly credible. Aguilar v. TexasSearch
-
U. S. 108 (1964). In the recent case of Spinelli v. UnitedSearch
-
Director General v. KastenbaumSearch
-
the Fourth Amendment. This case marks a departure from the mainstream of our Fourth Amendment cases. In Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
s tip and actually smelled opium coming from a room. This Court still found the arrest unlawful. And in Spinelli v. UnitedSearch
-
In Sibron v. NewSearch
-
the Court held that the action of the policeman could not be justified as a stop and frisk. In Peters v. NewSearch
-
Sibron v. NewSearch
-
suspect be dangerous, as well as armed. Other courts have followed Terry more closely. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. BourkeSearch
-
Commonwealth v. ClarkeSearch
-
Finley v. PeopleSearch
-
Colo. 1, 488 P.2d 883 (1971). See also State v. GoudySearch
-
of this one fact is a far cry from the corroboration that the Court found sufficient to sustain an arrest in Draper v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Adams v. WilliamsSearch
-
Gaines v. CravenSearch
-
Spinelli v. UnitedSearch
-
See Draper v. UnitedSearch
-
See Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MillerSearch
-
of Terry v. OhioSearch
-
of Spinelli v. UnitedSearch
-
In Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
In Peters v. NewSearch
-
Commonwealth v. BourkeSearch
-
State v. GoudySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial