Citation network
Mitchum Vs. Foster
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 19, 1972
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 225 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Mitchum v. FosterSearch
-
U.S. 225 (1972) Mitchum v. FosterSearch
-
comity, and federalism that must restrain a federal court when asked to enjoin a state court proceeding ( cf. Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
II In denying injunctive relief, the District Court relied on this Court's decision in Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
civil or criminal and regardless of how extraordinary the particular circumstances may be. Last Term, in Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
U.S. at 401 U. S. 54 . In the companion case of Perez v. LedesmaSearch
-
U.S. at 401 U. S. 85 . See also Dyson v. SteinSearch
-
Oklahoma Packing Co. v. GasSearch
-
In Toucey v. NewSearch
-
Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. RichmanSearch
-
Kline v. BurkeSearch
-
Providence & N.Y. S.S. Co. v. HillSearch
-
Treines v. SunshineSearch
-
Kalb v. FuersteinSearch
-
of the Federal Government as a guarantor of basic federal rights against state power was clearly established. Monroe v. PapeSearch
-
McNeese v. BoardSearch
-
and it believed that these failings extended to the state courts. v. SectionSearch
-
Truax v. RaichSearch
-
These principles, in the context of state criminal prosecutions, were canvassed at length last Term in Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
and it companion case. They are principle that have been emphasized by this Court many times in the past. Fenner v. BoykinSearch
-
Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSearch
-
Beal v. MissouriSearch
-
Williams v. MillerSearch
-
Douglas v. CitySearch
-
Compare Cooper v. HutchinsonSearch
-
exception), with Baines v. CitySearch
-
See Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
U. S. 37 , 401 U. S. 54 . See also Lynch v. HouseholdSearch
-
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. BrotherhoodSearch
-
See First National Bank & Trust Co. v. VillageSearch
-
Byrne v. KaraleisSearch
-
the then strong feeling against the unwarranted intrusion of federal courts upon state sovereignty. Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
is doubtful. Compare Warren, Federal and State Court Interference, 43 Harv.L.Rev. 345, 347-348, with Gunter v. AtlanticSearch
-
Toucey v. NewSearch
-
See French v. HaySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial