Citation network
Central Hardware Co. Vs. Nlrb
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 22, 1972
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 539 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Central Hardware Co. v. NLRBSearch
-
U.S. 539 (1972) Central Hardware Co. v. NationalSearch
-
organizational rights. The NLRB concluded that the character and use of the lots distinguished the case from NLRB v. BabcockSearch
-
Id. at 351 U. S. 112 . Instead, the NLRB held applicable Food Employee v. LoganSearch
-
Act. The Board reasoned that the character and use of Central's parking lots distinguished the case from NLRB v. BabcockSearch
-
Wilcox Co., 351 U. S. 105 (1956), and brought it within the principle of Amalgamated Food Employees Union v. LoganSearch
-
the two. This Court addressed the conflict which often arises between organization rights and property rights in NLRB v. BabcockSearch
-
it may require is both temporary and minimal. II The principle applied in Amalgamated Food Employees Union v. LoganSearch
-
case. Logan Valley had its genesis in Marsh v. AlabamaSearch
-
evidence to support agency findings is a matter entrusted primarily to the courts of appeals. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
S. 474 (1951). Since the Court of Appeals has not yet considered this question in light of the principles of NLRB v. BabcockSearch
-
See Thomas v. CollinsSearch
-
NLRB v. BabcockSearch
-
Valley and the circumstances in which it is applicable, see the decision of the Court today in Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN join, dissenting. I agree with the Court that this case should have been considered under NLRB v. BabcockSearch
-
S. 105 (1956). That case is, as the opinion of the Court suggests, narrower than Amalgamated Food Employees Union v. LoganSearch
-
well established that decisions on constitutional questions should not be reached unnecessarily. See, e.g., Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
the same way under the correct approach, but should instead remand the case to the agency for further proceedings. FTC v. SperrySearch
-
Hutchinson Co., 405 U. S. 233 , 405 U. S. 249 (1972). See also Burlington Truck Lines v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Central Hardware Co. v. NLRBSearch
-
Central Hardware Co. v. NationalSearch
-
Food Employee v. LoganSearch
-
of Amalgamated Food Employees Union v. LoganSearch
-
Amalgamated Food Employees Union v. LoganSearch
-
Marsh v. AlabamaSearch
-
Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
of NLRB v. BabcockSearch
-
Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSearch
-
Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
FTC v. SperrySearch
-
Burlington Truck Lines v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial