Citation network
Barker Vs. Wingo
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 22, 1972
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 514 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Barker v. WingoSearch
-
U.S. 514 (1972) Barker v. WingoSearch
-
this Court has dealt with that right on infrequent occasions. See Beavers v. HaubertSearch
-
Pollard v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 307 (1971). See also United States v. ProvooSearch
-
F.R.D. 183 (D. Md.), aff'd, 30 U.S. 857 (1955). The Court's opinion in Klopfer v. NorthSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
See Smith v. HooeySearch
-
but the Kentucky Court of Appeals reversed because of the admission of evidence obtained by an illegal search. Manning v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Appeals again reversed Page 407 U. S. 517 because the trial court had not granted a change of venue. Manning v. CommonwealthSearch
-
his conviction to the Kentucky Court of Appeals, relying in part on his speedy trial claim. The court affirmed. Barker v. CommonwealthSearch
-
a defendant exercises or waives his right to counsel or his right to a jury trial. Thus, as we recognized in Beavers v. HaubertSearch
-
Aetna Ins. Co. v. KennedySearch
-
Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Utilities Comm'n, 301 U. S. 292 , 301 U. S. 307 (137). In Carnley v. CochranSearch
-
Court has ruled similarly with respect to waiver of other rights designed to protect the accused. See, e.g., Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
the Constitution. v. TheSearch
-
Testimony of James v. BennettSearch
-
E.g., Pines v. DistrictSearch
-
See State v. MaldonadoSearch
-
Hicks v. PeopleSearch
-
People v. ProsserSearch
-
Zehrlaut v. StateSearch
-
Flanary v. CommonwealthSearch
-
State v. HessSearch
-
State v. DodsonSearch
-
Ore. 458, 360 P.2d 782 (1961). But see State v. VawterSearch
-
See United States v. HillSearch
-
Bruce v. UnitedSearch
-
Pietch v. UnitedSearch
-
Smith v. UnitedSearch
-
to be that a denial of speedy trial can be found despite an absence of a demand under some circumstances. See Bandy v. UnitedSearch
-
Moser v. UnitedSearch
-
is unclear. There are cases in which a failure to demand is strictly construed as a waiver. E.g., United States v. DeMasiSearch
-
court has seemed to be willing to consider claims in which there was no demand. E.g., United States ex rel. Solomon v. MancusiSearch
-
the District Courts in the Second Circuit have not regarded the demand rule as being rigid. See United States v. MannSearch
-
United States v. DillonSearch
-
F.Supp. 541 (SDNY 1960). The First Circuit also seems to reject the more rigid approach. Compare United States v. ButlerSearch
-
F.2d 1275 (1970), with Needel v. ScafatiSearch
-
Hodges v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SimmonsSearch
-
delay of nine months overly long, absent a good reason, in a case that depended on eyewitness testimony. United States v. ButlerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial