Citation network
Perry Vs. Sindermann
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 29, 1972
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 593 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
U.S. 593 (1972) Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
We granted a writ of certiorari, 403 U.S. 917, and we have considered this case along with Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
rights is impermissible. We have applied this general principle to denials of tax exemptions, Speiser v. RandallSearch
-
supra, unemployment benefits, Sherbert v. VernerSearch
-
U. S. 398 , 374 U. S. 404 -405, and welfare payments, Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Graham v. RichardsonSearch
-
U. S. 374 . But, most often, we have applied the principle to denials of public employment. United Public Workers v. MitchellSearch
-
Cramp v. BoardSearch
-
Bagett v. BullittSearch
-
Keyishian v. BoardSearch
-
Pickering v. BoardSearch
-
have applied the principle regardless of the public employee's contractual or other claim to a job. Compare Pickering v. BoardSearch
-
Shelton v. TuckerSearch
-
teacher's one-year contract may not be predicated on his exercise of First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Shelton v. TuckerSearch
-
constitutionally protected, and may, therefore, be an impermissible basis for termination of his employment. Pickering v. BoardSearch
-
his procedural due process claim. But it may not be entirely dispositive. We have held today in Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
that may supplement a collective bargaining agreement, Steelworkers v. WarriorSearch
-
based on his constitutionally protected conduct. 430 F.2d at 944. We have rejected this approach in Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
This opinion applies also to No. 71-162, Board of Regents of State Colleges et al. v. RothSearch
-
be considered fully by the District Court. But, for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Board of Regents v. RothSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Perry v. SindermannSearch
-
Shapiro v. ThompsonSearch
-
Compare Pickering v. BoardSearch
-
Steelworkers v. WarriorSearch
-
Elfbrandt v. RussellSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial