Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Wyman Vs. James

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 12, 1971

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

71 entries 10 linked 61 unlinked
Show
  1. Wolf Vs. Colorado US Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1949
  2. Mapp Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
  3. Chimel Vs. California US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1969
  4. Vale Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1970
  5. Dandridge Vs. Williams US Supreme Court · Apr 06, 1970
  6. Shapiro Vs. Thompson US Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1969
  7. Goldberg Vs. Kelly US Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1970
  8. Flemming Vs. Nestor US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1960
    Relied / Followed
  9. Poe Vs. Ullman US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
  10. Speiser Vs. Randall US Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1958
  11. U.S. 309 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Wyman v. James
    Search
  12. U.S. 309 (1971) Wyman v. James
    Search
  13. does not involve a search for violations, is not a criminal prosecution but the termination of relief benefits. Camara v. Municipal
    Search
  14. See v. City
    Search
  15. and granting injunctive relief. James v. Goldberg
    Search
  16. program. She asked for declaratory and injunctive relief. A temporary restraining order was issued on June 13, James v. Goldberg
    Search
  17. Camara v. Municipal
    Search
  18. over the years, the Court consistently has been most protective of the privacy of the dwelling. See, for example, Boyd v. United
    Search
  19. not descend to the level of unreasonableness. It is unreasonableness which is the Fourth Amendment's standard. Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  20. Elkins v. United
    Search
  21. census taker's questions. See MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL's opinion, as United States Circuit Judge, in United States v. Rickenbacker
    Search
  22. from that refusal. The choice is entirely hers, and nothing of constitutional magnitude is involved. VI Camara v. Municipal
    Search
  23. Court, 387 U. S. 523 (1967), and its companion case, See v. City
    Search
  24. held that the Fourth Amendment barred prosecution for refusal to permit the desired warrantless inspection. Frank v. Maryland
    Search
  25. conceivable circumstances. The early morning mass raid upon homes of welfare recipients is not unknown. See Parrish v. Civil
    Search
  26. In Goldberg v. Kelly
    Search
  27. and Supp. 19691970). Aspects of AFDC have been considered in King v. Smith
    Search
  28. and Dandridge v. Williams
    Search
  29. No issue of procedural due process is raised in this case. Cf. Goldberg v. Kelly
    Search
  30. U. S. 254 (1970), and Wheeler v. Montgomery
    Search
  31. her constitutional right, Barbara James in this case would have received the welfare benefit. We spoke in Speiser v. Randall
    Search
  32. Hannegan v. Esquire
    Search
  33. Inc., 327 U. S. 146 , 327 U. S. 156 . In Sherbert v. Verner
    Search
  34. Id. at 374 U. S. 404 , 374 U. S. 406 . These cases are in the tradition of United States v. Chicago
    Search
  35. which the Fourth protects is perhaps as vivid in our lives as the right of expression sponsored by the First. Griswold v. Connecticut
    Search
  36. to her home unless they came with a warrant. Page 400 U. S. 331 That is the teaching of Camara v. Municipal
    Search
  37. Court, 387 U. S. 523 , and See v. City
    Search
  38. of Seattle, 387 U. S. 541 . In those cases, we overruled Frank v. Maryland
    Search
  39. but the sanctity of the sanctuary of the home is such -- as marked and defined by the Fourth Amendment, McDonald v. United
    Search
  40. Frost & Frost Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  41. Satires 39 (Indiana Univ. Press 1958). In the 1837 Term, the Court held in City of New York v. Miln
    Search
  42. Mass raids upon the homes of welfare recipients are matters of record. See Parrish v. Civil
    Search
  43. Amendment governs all intrusions by agents of the public upon personal security, Page 400 U. S. 339 Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  44. the contention that only suspected criminals are protected by the Fourth Amendment, Camara v. Municipal
    Search
  45. that a man's home is his castle. Only last Term, we reaffirmed that this concept has lost none of its vitality, Rowan v. United
    Search
  46. Actually, the home visit is precisely the type of inspection proscribed by Camara and its companion case, See v. City
    Search
  47. to a few narrowly drawn exceptions, any search without a warrant is constitutionally unreasonable, see, e.g., Agnello v. United
    Search
  48. Johnson v. United
    Search
  49. Chapman v. United
    Search
  50. U.S. Supreme Court Wyman v. James
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial