Citation network
Perkins Vs. Matthews
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 14, 1971
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 379 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Perkins v. MatthewsSearch
-
U.S. 379 (1971) Perkins v. MatthewsSearch
-
for by a 1962 Mississippi statute, the 1965 Canton election was by wards. A single District Judge, relying on Allen v. StateSearch
-
judge court misconceived the permissible scope of its inquiry into appellants' allegations. Our decision in Allen v. StateSearch
-
the case of Allen versus StateSearch
-
and such potential inheres in a change in the composition of the electorate affected by an annexation. Gomillion v. LightfootSearch
-
Page 400 U. S. 390 In Fairley v. PattersonSearch
-
can be affected by a dilution of voting power as well as by an absolute prohibition on casting a ballot. See Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Congress intended to adopt the concept of voting articulated in Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Fairley v. PattersonSearch
-
from ward to at-large elections of all aldermen was, of course, a change within the coverage of the Act. Fairley v. PattersonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
date. Ordinarily we presume that officials will act in accordance with law. See First National Bank of Albuquerque v. AlbrightSearch
-
Allen v. StateSearch
-
In its amicus brief filed in this Court in Fairley v. PattersonSearch
-
MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE joins, concurring in the judgment. Given the decision in Allen v. StateSearch
-
could constitutionally require a State to submit all changes in its laws for federal approval, cf. South Carolina v. KatzenbachSearch
-
The legislative history of the Voting Rights Act was examined in the majority opinion and a separate opinion in Allen v. StateSearch
-
election law and to reach matters such as annexations, which affect voting only incidentally and peripherally. Fairley v. PattersonSearch
-
Act differently seems to me to give too much weight to the passing remark of an Assistant Attorney General. Cf. Allen v. StateSearch
-
II Fairley v. PattersonSearch
-
a hearing at which they may address themselves to the issue. MR. JUSTICE BLACK, dissenting. In South Carolina v. KatzenbachSearch
-
I have stated my belief, in dissents in Katzenbach and Allen v. StateSearch
-
city of Canton to comply with such an order. For the reasons set out above and in my dissents in South Carolina v. KatzenbachSearch
-
supra, and Allen v. StateSearch
-
iven the decision in Allen v. StateSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Perkins v. MatthewsSearch
-
of Allen v. StateSearch
-
In Fairley v. PattersonSearch
-
See Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
of the Act. Fairley v. PattersonSearch
-
See First National Bank of Albuquerque v. AlbrightSearch
-
Assistant Attorney General. Cf. Allen v. StateSearch
-
In South Carolina v. KatzenbachSearch
-
Katzenbach and Allen v. StateSearch
-
and Allen v. StateSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial