Citation network
WisconsIn Vs. Constantineau
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 19, 1971
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 433 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSearch
-
U.S. 433 (1971) Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSearch
-
issue of state law, the federal court properly proceeded to determine the federal constitutional claim. Zwickler v. KootaSearch
-
power of the States over intoxicating liquors was extremely broad even prior to the Twenty-first Amendment. Crane v. CampbellSearch
-
procedure that marks much of the difference between rule by law and rule by fiat. We reviewed in Cafeteria Workers v. McElroySearch
-
that have fallen on one side or the other of the line. See also Sniadach v. FamilySearch
-
to the citizen, due process comes into play. Wieman v. UpdegraffSearch
-
Anti-Fascist Committee v. McGrathSearch
-
enmeshed with state law questions. In 1941, we gave vigor to the so-called abstention doctrine in Railroad Commission v. PullmanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
by a state court of the underlying state law question. We applied the abstention doctrine most recently in Fornaris v. RidgeSearch
-
We ordered the federal courts to stay their hands until the Puerto Rican courts had spoken. Speaking of Reetz v. BozanichSearch
-
have dealt with unresolved questions of state law which only a state tribunal could authoritatively construe. Reetz v. BozanichSearch
-
of Meridian v. SouthernSearch
-
by an unresolved state law, is whether that Act, on its face, is unconstitutional. As we said in Zwickler v. KootaSearch
-
See 18 Stat. 470. We recently reviewed this history in Zwickler v. KootaSearch
-
is not necessary whenever a federal court is faced with a question of local law, the classic case being Meredith v. WinterSearch
-
on diversity only. Abstention certainly involves duplication of effort and expense and an attendant delay. See England v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 411 . That is why we have said that this judicially created rule which stems from Railroad Comm'n v. PullmanSearch
-
Co., 312 U. S. 496 , should be applied only where 'the issue of state law is uncertain.' Harman v. ForsseniusSearch
-
City of Meridian v. SouthernSearch
-
Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 358 U. S. 639 , 358 U. S. 640 -641 (1959). See also Fornaris v. RidgeSearch
-
while the litigants exhausted state court remedies for resolution of their challenge to the statute. See also Fornaris v. RidgeSearch
-
on state action contained in the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pauly v. KeeblerSearch
-
of the Constitution. See, e.g., United States v. LovettSearch
-
should not stay their hands to permit state court to Page 400 U. S. 445 interpret state law. Compare Clay v. SunSearch
-
Insurance Office, 363 U. S. 207 , 363 U. S. 213 -227 (1960) (BLACK, J., dissenting), with Burford v. SunSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSearch
-
the Twenty-first Amendment. Crane v. CampbellSearch
-
Sniadach v. FamilySearch
-
Railroad Commission v. PullmanSearch
-
Fornaris v. RidgeSearch
-
Speaking of Reetz v. BozanichSearch
-
Meredith v. WinterSearch
-
See England v. LouisianaSearch
-
Railroad Comm'n v. PullmanSearch
-
the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Pauly v. KeeblerSearch
-
Compare Clay v. SunSearch
-
Burford v. SunSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial