Citation network
Groppi Vs. Wisconsin
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 25, 1971
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 505 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Groppi v. WisconsinSearch
-
U.S. 505 (1971) Groppi v. WisconsinSearch
-
the construction that the Supreme Court of Wisconsin has put upon the state statute. E.g., Kingsley Pictures Corp. v. RegentsSearch
-
We had occasion to consider this precise question almost 10 years ago in Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
he stands unsworne.' Co.Litt. 155b. His verdict must be based upon the evidence developed at the trial. Cf. Thompson v. CitySearch
-
In Sheppard v. MaxwellSearch
-
of prospective jurors infected with the prejudice of the community from which they come. But this protection, as Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
to assure the kind of impartial jury that is guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. That was in the case of Rideau v. LouisianaSearch
-
Accord, Pamplin v. MasonSearch
-
Ricco v. BiggsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
That question was answered affirmatively in Baldwin v. NewSearch
-
Wisconsin grants a right to trial by jury in all misdemeanor cases. See State ex rel. Murphy v. VossSearch
-
Sauk County District Attorney v. GollmarSearch
-
See Klopfer v. NorthSearch
-
See Rex v. HarrisSearch
-
Lord Mansfield.) See also Crocker v. JusticesSearch
-
State v. AlbeeSearch
-
the appellant short of a new trial will be for the Wisconsin courts to determine in the first instance. Cf. Coleman v. AlabamaSearch
-
known, at all approaches the circumstances and the offensive character of what this Court condemned in Sheppard v. MaxwellSearch
-
U. S. 333 (1966), in Rideau v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 723 (1963), and in Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
the Sixth Amendment and made binding on the States by the Fourteenth. Ante at 400 U. S. 509 . Cf. Parker v. GladdenSearch
-
Adamson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
the defendant can always be given a new trial on the ground of jury prejudice. The Court suggests that Rideau v. LouisianaSearch
-
right by a motion for a new trial, I see no constitutional infirmity in the Wisconsin statute. Nor does Irvin v. DowdSearch
-
s literal wording did not foreclose a second change of venue. 366 U.S. at 366 U. S. 721 , citing Gannon v. PorterSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Groppi v. WisconsinSearch
-
E.g., Kingsley Pictures Corp. v. RegentsSearch
-
Cf. Thompson v. CitySearch
-
of Rideau v. LouisianaSearch
-
Ricco v. BiggsSearch
-
Baldwin v. NewSearch
-
Murphy v. VossSearch
-
Sauk County District Attorney v. GollmarSearch
-
Crocker v. JusticesSearch
-
State v. AlbeeSearch
-
Cf. Coleman v. AlabamaSearch
-
Rideau v. LouisianaSearch
-
Cf. Parker v. GladdenSearch
-
Adamson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Gannon v. PorterSearch
-
Irvin v. DowdSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial