Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Monitor Patriot Co. Vs. Roy

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 24, 1971

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 4 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Cantwell Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · May 20, 1940
  2. St. Amant Vs. Thompson US Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1968
  3. New York Times Co. Vs. Sullivan US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1964
  4. Time, Inc. Vs. Pape US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1971
  5. U.S. 265 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy
    Search
  6. U.S. 265 (1971) Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy
    Search
  7. rule of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  8. in order to consider the constitutional issues presented by the case. 397 U.S. 904. I In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  9. public office or to the performance of official acts, or, for that matter, to conventional civil libel suits. Garrison v. Louisiana
    Search
  10. Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts
    Search
  11. Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn. v. Bresler
    Search
  12. Roth v. United
    Search
  13. New York Times rule is not applicable because of the nature of the libel in question. Cf. Ocala Star-Banner Co. v. Damron
    Search
  14. of fact and matters of law, is of little utility in resolving questions of First Amendment protection. In Garrison v. Louisiana
    Search
  15. U.S. at 379 U. S. 76 -77. Cf. Ocala Star-Banner Co. v. Damron
    Search
  16. Abrams v. United
    Search
  17. to a candidate's fitness for office. Cf. Speiser v. Randall
    Search
  18. Smith v. California
    Search
  19. Coleman v. MacLennan
    Search
  20. Court in this case and in No. 109 and No. 118, for the reasons set out in my concurring opinion in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  21. U. S. 254 , 376 U. S. 293 (1964), in my concurring and dissenting opinion in Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts
    Search
  22. U. S. 130 , 388 U. S. 170 (1967), and in MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS' concurring opinion in Garrison v. Louisiana
    Search
  23. t is time for this Court to abandon New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  24. This opinion applies also to No. 109, Time, Inc. v. Pape
    Search
  25. post, p. 401 U. S. 279 , and No. 118, Ocala Star Banner Co. et al. v. Damron
    Search
  26. U.S. Supreme Court Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy
    Search
  27. of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  28. I In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    Search
  29. Garrison v. Louisiana
    Search
  30. Cf. Ocala Star-Banner Co. v. Damron
    Search
  31. In Garrison v. Louisiana
    Search
  32. Cf. Speiser v. Randall
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial