Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Boddie Vs. Connecticut

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 02, 1971

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

50 entries 11 linked 39 unlinked
Show
  1. Meyer Vs. Nebraska US Supreme Court · Jun 04, 1923
  2. Windsor Vs. Mcveigh US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1876
  3. Hovey Vs. Elliott US Supreme Court · May 24, 1897
  4. Armstrong Vs. Manzo US Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1965
  5. Londoner Vs. Denver US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1908
  6. Goldberg Vs. Kelly US Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1970
  7. Fahey Vs. Mallonee US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1947
  8. Bowles Vs. Willingham US Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1944
  9. Cantwell Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · May 20, 1940
  10. Sherbert Vs. Verner US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1963
  11. Hammond Packing Co. Vs. Arkansas US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1909
  12. U.S. 371 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Boddie v. Connecticut
    Search
  13. U.S. 371 (1971) Boddie v. Connecticut
    Search
  14. than one occasion has recognized, marriage involves interests of basic importance in our society. See, e.g., Loving v. Virginia
    Search
  15. Skinner v. Oklahoma
    Search
  16. U. S. 274 , 93 U. S. 277 (1876). See Baldwin v. Hale
    Search
  17. as Mr. Justice Jackson wrote for the Court in Mullane v. Central
    Search
  18. a procedural rule requiring the production of evidence necessary for orderly adjudication, Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas
    Search
  19. Mullane v. Central
    Search
  20. by particular laws Page 401 U. S. 380 that operate to jeopardize it for particular individuals. See Mullane v. Central
    Search
  21. Covey v. Town
    Search
  22. least calculated to bring to a potential defendant's attention the pendency of judicial proceedings. See Mullane v. Central
    Search
  23. as a mechanism of resource allocation or cost recoupment. Such a justification was offered and rejected in Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  24. See Goldberg v. Kelly
    Search
  25. Sniadach v. Family
    Search
  26. Schroeder v. New
    Search
  27. Best v. Humboldt
    Search
  28. Anderson Nat. Bank v. Luckett
    Search
  29. Opp Cotton Mills v. Administrator
    Search
  30. Morgan v. United
    Search
  31. United States v. Illinois
    Search
  32. Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. Hill
    Search
  33. Coe v. Armour
    Search
  34. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Schmidt
    Search
  35. Compare Goldberg v. Kelly
    Search
  36. supra, with In re Winship, 397 U. S. 358 (1970). See also Bowles v. Willingham
    Search
  37. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union v. McElroy
    Search
  38. Ewing v. Mytinger
    Search
  39. Yakus v. United
    Search
  40. E.g., Schneider v. State
    Search
  41. Bates v. Little
    Search
  42. Jeffreys v. Jeffreys
    Search
  43. Misc.2d 1045, 1056, 296 N.Y.S.2d 74, 87 (1968). See also Brown v. Chastain
    Search
  44. U.S. Supreme Court Boddie v. Connecticut
    Search
  45. Loving v. Virginia
    Search
  46. See Baldwin v. Hale
    Search
  47. See Mullane v. Central
    Search
  48. Griffin v. Illinois
    Search
  49. Brown v. Chastain
    Search
  50. Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales