Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Whiteley Vs. Warden

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 29, 1971

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

59 entries 6 linked 53 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Ventresca US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1965
  2. Aguilar Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1964
  3. Mccray Vs. Illinois US Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1967
    Relied / Followed
  4. Harrington Vs. California US Supreme Court · Jun 02, 1969
  5. Fay Vs. Noia US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1963
  6. Chambers Vs. Maroney US Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1970
  7. U.S. 560 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Whiteley v. Warden
    Search
  8. U.S. 560 (1971) Whiteley v. Warden
    Search
  9. trial court overruled petitioner's motion to suppress, and, on appeal, the Supreme Court of Wyoming affirmed. Whiteley v. State
    Search
  10. Whiteley v. Wyoming
    Search
  11. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for Page 401 U. S. 562 the Tenth Circuit affirmed. Whiteley v. Meacham
    Search
  12. Spinelli v. United
    Search
  13. Rugendorf v. United
    Search
  14. Jones v. United
    Search
  15. Giordenello v. United
    Search
  16. That proposition has been consistently rejected by this Court. United States v. Ventresca
    Search
  17. and search are at least as stringent as the standards applied with respect to the magistrate's assessment. See McCray v. Illinois
    Search
  18. to sustain a finding of probable cause for an arrest that could not adequately be supported by the tip alone. Draper v. United
    Search
  19. States, 358 U. S. 307 (1959). See Spinelli v. United
    Search
  20. of committing the felony. See the opinions of the Court and that of MR. JUSTICE WHITE concurring in Spinelli v. United
    Search
  21. the reliability of the informant or the informant's conclusion that these men were connected with the crime. Spinelli v. United
    Search
  22. the evidence secured as an incident thereto should have been excluded from his trial. Mapp v. Ohio
    Search
  23. Cf. Giordenello v. United
    Search
  24. of the State of Wyoming v. Harold
    Search
  25. In Ker v. California
    Search
  26. cause standards were applicable to federal and state warrants under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. In Mapp v. Ohio
    Search
  27. possessed by the affiant when he sought the warrant but not disclosed to the issuing magistrate. See Aguilar v. Texas
    Search
  28. accomplice's testimony. It is clear that the error cannot be said to be harmless under applicable standards. Chapman v. California
    Search
  29. six times in the penitentiary. The Supreme Court of Wyoming affirmed the conviction September 15, 1966, Whiteley v. State
    Search
  30. men had committed a burglary and that they had the fruits of their crime in the car, citing among other cases Carroll v. United
    Search
  31. States, 267 U. S. 132 (1925). See also Chambers v. Maroney
    Search
  32. or justice of the peace prior to the issuance of a search or arrest warrant is a matter of record. See Aguilar v. Texas
    Search
  33. to label it, gave police officers proper grounds to stop petitioner's car and inquire about its passengers. Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  34. authority to search the car. Such a search could be justified under either of two theories. Even under Chimel v. California
    Search
  35. exception to the usual requirement for a search warrant. Chambers v. Maroney
    Search
  36. Carroll v. United
    Search
  37. his judgment of conviction, although petitioner does not, of course, now allege his innocence. As I said in Kaufman v. United
    Search
  38. States, 394 U. S. 217 , 394 U. S. 231 (BLACK, J., dissenting), the Fay v. Noia
    Search
  39. The search in this case took place on November 24, 1964. Although I disagreed with Spinelli v. United
    Search
  40. I have always believed that constitutional decisions should be fully retroactive in their application. See Linkletter v. Walker
    Search
  41. see id. at 381 U. S. 639 , and will greatly burden the administration of justice, see Desist v. United
    Search
  42. U.S. Supreme Court Whiteley v. Warden
    Search
  43. Whiteley v. State
    Search
  44. Whiteley v. Meacham
    Search
  45. Court. United States v. Ventresca
    Search
  46. See McCray v. Illinois
    Search
  47. Draper v. United
    Search
  48. See Spinelli v. United
    Search
  49. Mapp v. Ohio
    Search
  50. of the State of Wyoming v. Harold
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial