Citation network
Labine Vs. Vincent
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 29, 1971
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 532 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Labine v. VincentSearch
-
U.S. 532 (1971) Labine v. VincentSearch
-
The Louisiana Court of Appeal affirmed. The State Supreme Court denied certiorari. Appellant, relying on Levy v. LouisianaSearch
-
Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Constitution. Much reliance is placed upon the Court's decisions in Levy v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 68 (1968), and Glona v. AmericanSearch
-
children simply by stating in his acknowledgment of paternity his desire to legitimate the little girl. See Bergeron v. MillerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Nor is Glona v. AmericanSearch
-
How. 490, 49 U. S. 493 (1850). See Lyeth v. HoeySearch
-
for a discrimination in a state statute, or whether the discrimination is invidious. E.g., Morey v. DoudSearch
-
Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
law. The only other hint at an attempt to support today's result may appear in the purported distinction of Levy v. LouisianaSearch
-
Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. EllisSearch
-
after the death of the father. This argument, of course, was the focal point of the dissent in Levy and Glona v. AmericanSearch
-
Hirabayashi v. UnitedSearch
-
whose actions the State seeks to influence. Given the importance and nature of the decision to marry, cf. Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
from the State's classification. Glona v. AmericanSearch
-
alleged in the parent's will. Pennywell v. GeorgeSearch
-
the Constitution does not commit the power to regulate intestate succession exclusively to the States. United States v. OregonSearch
-
E.g., Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
U. S. 553 (1931). Cf. Plessy v. FergusonSearch
-
Brown v. BoardSearch
-
whether fundamental rights are involved, which also would require a showing of a compelling state interest. See Levy v. LouisianaSearch
-
Harper v. VirginiaSearch
-
Skinner v. OklahomaSearch
-
and Glona v. AmericanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Labine v. VincentSearch
-
See Bergeron v. MillerSearch
-
Glona v. AmericanSearch
-
See Lyeth v. HoeySearch
-
E.g., Morey v. DoudSearch
-
of Levy v. LouisianaSearch
-
Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
Levy and Glona v. AmericanSearch
-
Pennywell v. GeorgeSearch
-
the States. United States v. OregonSearch
-
Cf. Plessy v. FergusonSearch
-
See Levy v. LouisianaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial