Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Richardson Vs. Perales

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 03, 1971

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

54 entries 2 linked 52 unlinked
Show
  1. Flemming Vs. Nestor US Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1960
  2. Goldberg Vs. Kelly US Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1970
  3. U.S. 389 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Richardson v. Perales
    Search
  4. U.S. 389 (1971) Richardson v. Perales
    Search
  5. court amounted to hearsay upon hearsay. The case was remanded for a new hearing before a different examiner. Perales v. Secretary
    Search
  6. evidence when it was objected to and when it was contradicted by evidence from the only live witnesses. Cohen v. Perales
    Search
  7. the hearsay was directly contradicted by the testimony of live medical witnesses and by the claimant in person. Cohen v. Perales
    Search
  8. Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  9. U. S. 229 (1938). The Court has adhered to that definition in varying statutory situations. See NLRB v. Columbian
    Search
  10. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  11. Consolo v. Federal
    Search
  12. an exception to the hearsay rule. Notable is Judge Parker's well known ruling in the war risk insurance case of Long v. United
    Search
  13. here, but which, because of its length, we do not reproduce. The Second Circuit has made a like ruling in White v. Zutell
    Search
  14. Page v. Celebrezze
    Search
  15. already in short supply. VI 1. Perales relies heavily on the Court's holding and statements in Goldberg v. Kelly
    Search
  16. and would relate this to Mr. Chief Justice Hughes' sentence in Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  17. also criticize the use of Dr. Leavitt as a medical adviser. 288 F.Supp. at 314, 412 F.2d at 53-54. See also Mefford v. Gardner
    Search
  18. Dr. Leavitt did not vouch for the accuracy of the facts assumed in the reports. No one understood otherwise. See Doe v. Department
    Search
  19. that justice must satisfy the appearance of justice, citing Offutt v. United
    Search
  20. Ratliff v. Celebrezze
    Search
  21. Miracle v. Celebrezze
    Search
  22. Ber v. Celebrezze
    Search
  23. Stancavage v. Celebrezze
    Search
  24. Dupkunis v. Celebrezze
    Search
  25. Cochran v. Celebrezze
    Search
  26. Cuthrell v. Celebrezze
    Search
  27. Aldridge v. Celebrezze
    Search
  28. Dodsworth v. Celebrezze
    Search
  29. Bridges v. Gardner
    Search
  30. Green v. Gardner
    Search
  31. Martin v. Finch
    Search
  32. Breaux v. Finch
    Search
  33. Phillips v. Celebrezze
    Search
  34. Justice v. Gardner
    Search
  35. Moon v. Celebrezze
    Search
  36. Pierce v. Gardner
    Search
  37. Celebrezze v. Sutton
    Search
  38. Brasher v. Celebrezze
    Search
  39. McMullen v. Celebrezze
    Search
  40. Flake v. Gardner
    Search
  41. Celebrezze v. Warren
    Search
  42. McMillin v. Gardner
    Search
  43. See Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  44. U.S. Supreme Court Richardson v. Perales
    Search
  45. Perales v. Secretary
    Search
  46. Cohen v. Perales
    Search
  47. See NLRB v. Columbian
    Search
  48. of Long v. United
    Search
  49. White v. Zutell
    Search
  50. Mefford v. Gardner
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial