Citation network
United States Vs. Reidel
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 03, 1971
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 351 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ReidelSearch
-
U.S. 351 (1971) United States v. ReidelSearch
-
as applied to the distribution of obscene materials to willing recipients who state that they are adults. Roth v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 354 U. S. 476 . The decision in Stanley v. GeorgiaSearch
-
II In Roth v. UnitedSearch
-
it occurs and the materials are found in fact, to be obscene, would be no more vulnerable than was Roth's. Stanley v. GeorgiaSearch
-
judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia rejecting claims that under Stanley v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Georgia's obscenity statute could not be applied to book sellers. Gable v. JenkinsSearch
-
Roth v. UnitedSearch
-
States was heard and decided with Alberts v. CaliforniaSearch
-
The Court today correctly rejects the contention that the recognition in Stanley Page 402 U. S. 358 v. GeorgiaSearch
-
of children. That interpretation of Stanley, however, is flatly inconsistent with the square holding of Roth v. UnitedSearch
-
obscenity, the system must be designed to minimize impact on speech which is constitutionally protected. Blount v. RizziSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Marcus v. SearchSearch
-
Warrant, 367 U. S. 717 , 367 U. S. 731 (1961). See Freedman v. MarylandSearch
-
zone ensuring the freedom of a man's inner life, be it rich or sordid. Cf. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
post, p. 402 U. S. 363 , and concurring in the judgment in No. 534. Only two years ago, in Stanley v. GeorgiaSearch
-
and the Court reaffirmed the principles of Roth v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 354 U. S. 476 (1957), Redrup v. NewSearch
-
is inconsistent with the principle that determinations of obscenity should focus on an entire work, see, e.g., Roth v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ReidelSearch
-
Stanley v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Roth's. Stanley v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Alberts v. CaliforniaSearch
-
of Roth v. UnitedSearch
-
See Freedman v. MarylandSearch
-
Cf. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
Redrup v. NewSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial