Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mcgee Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 17, 1971

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 30 unlinked
Show
  1. McGee v. United
    Search
  2. States - 402 U.S. 479 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court McGee v. United
    Search
  3. States, 402 U.S. 479 (1971) McGee v. United
    Search
  4. to assess his claims to exempt status, and thus bars petitioner's defense that he was erroneously classified. McKart v. United
    Search
  5. The conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Page 402 U. S. 483 II Two Terms ago, in McKart v. United
    Search
  6. doctrine in Selective Service cases, and the policies that underpin the doctrine. As it has evolved since Falbo v. United
    Search
  7. States, 320 U. S. 549 (1944), and Estep v. United
    Search
  8. process which might have cured or rendered moot the very defect later complained of in court. Cf. Oestereich v. Selective
    Search
  9. Gibson v. United
    Search
  10. Estep v. United
    Search
  11. Witmer v. United
    Search
  12. See McKart v. United
    Search
  13. process designed to marshal relevant facts and resolve factual issues in the first instance. Cf. Dickinson v. United
    Search
  14. turn on the resolution of factual questions relating to the nature of a registrant's beliefs concerning war, Gillette v. United
    Search
  15. States, 401 U. S. 437 (1971), the basis of the objection in conscience and religion, Welsh v. United
    Search
  16. States, 398 U. S. 333 (1970), and the registrant's sincerity, Witmer v. United
    Search
  17. on the facts, is a much stronger one for dispensing with the need to exhaust administrative remedies than was McKart v. United
    Search
  18. premature access to the courts on the part of a litigant seeking affirmatively to challenge agency action. Cf. McKart v. United
    Search
  19. autonomy and proper functioning of the particular administrative system Congress has constructed. See generally Mulloy v. United
    Search
  20. Witmer v. United
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court McGee v. United
    Search
  22. McKart v. United
    Search
  23. Falbo v. United
    Search
  24. and Estep v. United
    Search
  25. Cf. Oestereich v. Selective
    Search
  26. Cf. Dickinson v. United
    Search
  27. Gillette v. United
    Search
  28. Welsh v. United
    Search
  29. Cf. McKart v. United
    Search
  30. Mulloy v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial