Citation network
Abate Vs. Mundt
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 07, 1971
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 182 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Abate v. MundtSearch
-
U.S. 182 (1971) Abate v. MundtSearch
-
district court required that the county board submit a reapportionment plan to the Rockland County voters, Lodico v. BoardSearch
-
on the general principle of population equality, and that this principle applies to state and local elections, Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
S. 577 (1964), but deviations from population equality must be justified by legitimate state considerations, Swann v. AdamsSearch
-
may need considerable flexibility in municipal arrangements if they are to meet changing societal needs, Sailors v. BoardSearch
-
integrity of political subdivisions may justify an apportionment plan which departs from numerical equality. Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
will tend to favor, for example, less populous districts over their more highly populated neighbors, see Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
we affirm. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in Whitcomb v. ChavisSearch
-
the voting strength of particular racial or political elements of the Rockland County voting population, see Burns v. RichardsonSearch
-
with whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS joins, dissenting. The Court today reaffirms all of the principles of Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
to me, to apply those principles to this apportionment scheme. I believe that our recent decisions in Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 526 (1969), and Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
may justify an apportionment plan which departs from numerical equality. Reynolds Page 403 U. S. 188 v. SimsSearch
-
We have done so since. In Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
plan devised under these constraints is not devised in the good faith effort that the Constitution requires. In Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Abate v. MundtSearch
-
Lodico v. BoardSearch
-
Sailors v. BoardSearch
-
Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
of Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
and Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
In Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
In Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
Swann v. AdamsSearch
-
Whitcomb v. ChavisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial