Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mckeiver Vs. Pennsylvania

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 21, 1971

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

64 entries 8 linked 56 unlinked
Show
  1. Haley Vs. Ohio US Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1948
  2. Duncan Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · May 20, 1968
  3. Bloom Vs. Illinois US Supreme Court · May 20, 1968
  4. Leland Vs. Oregon US Supreme Court · Jun 09, 1952
  5. Gallegos Vs. Colorado US Supreme Court · Jun 04, 1962
  6. Debacker Vs. Brainard US Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1969
  7. Destefano Vs. Woods US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1968
  8. Malloy Vs. Hogan US Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1964
  9. U.S. 528 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  10. U.S. 528 (1971) McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  11. juvenile a right to jury trial, and the great majority that have faced that issue since Gault, supra, and Duncan v. Louisiana
    Search
  12. U.S. at 332 U. S. 601 . 2. Gallegos v. Colorado
    Search
  13. U. S. 49 (1962), where a 14-year-old was on trial, is to the same effect. 3. Kent v. United
    Search
  14. a State must provide appellate review in juvenile cases or a transcript or recording of the hearings. 5. DeBacker v. Brainard
    Search
  15. However, because that appellant's hearing had antedated the decisions in Duncan v. Louisiana
    Search
  16. U. S. 145 (1968), and Bloom v. Illinois
    Search
  17. S. 194 (1968), and because Duncan and Bloom had been given only prospective application by DeStefano v. Woods
    Search
  18. the Fifth Amendment's guarantee against self-incrimination had been imposed upon the state criminal trial. Malloy v. Hogan
    Search
  19. U. S. 1 (1964). So, too, had the Sixth Amendment's rights of confrontation and cross-examination. Pointer v. Texas
    Search
  20. U. S. 400 (1965), and Douglas v. Alabama
    Search
  21. Id. at 387 U. S. 13 -14. V The
    Search
  22. it surely would have not taken had it felt that the integrity of the result was seriously at issue. And in Williams v. Florida
    Search
  23. the state juvenile proceeding. What was done in Gault and in Winship is aptly described in Commonwealth v. Johnson
    Search
  24. by dictum that a jury is not a necessary part even of every criminal process that is fair and equitable. Duncan v. Louisiana
    Search
  25. principle of justice so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental.' Snyder v. Massachusetts
    Search
  26. Bible v. State
    Search
  27. Dryden v. Commonwealth
    Search
  28. Hopkins v. Youth
    Search
  29. State v. Turner
    Search
  30. Ore. 235, 453 P.2d 910 (1969). See In re Estes v. Hopp
    Search
  31. McMullen v. Geiger
    Search
  32. Neb. 581, 169 N.W.2d 431 (1969). To the contrary are Peyton v. Nord
    Search
  33. N.M. 717, 437 P.2d 716 (1968), and, semble, Nieves v. United
    Search
  34. Cinque v. Boyd
    Search
  35. Commonwealth v. Pale
    Search
  36. Singer v. United
    Search
  37. substitute for public or jury trial in protecting the petitioners against misuse of the judicial process. Cf. Duncan v. Louisiana
    Search
  38. criminal offenses may be tried without a jury notwithstanding the defendant's request. E.g., District of Columbia v. Clawans
    Search
  39. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, concurring in the judgments. If I felt myself constrained to follow Duncan v. Louisiana
    Search
  40. law or due process. See my concurring and dissenting opinion in Duncan and my separate opinion in Williams v. Florida
    Search
  41. at least a possible five-year incarceration. No adult could be denied a jury trial in those circumstances. Duncan v. Louisiana
    Search
  42. proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In re Winship, 397 U. S. 358 . Page 403 U. S. 561 In DeBacker v. Brainard
    Search
  43. to grant a juvenile, who was charged with forgery, a jury trial merely because the case was tried before Duncan v. Louisiana
    Search
  44. court has had less than five jury trials in the year 1969 to 1970. The recent Supreme Court decision of Williams vs Florida
    Search
  45. means at common law, a trial by a jury of twelve men, State vs. Simmons
    Search
  46. he is entitled to a trial by jury. ( Henry vs Cherry
    Search
  47. U.S. Supreme Court McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  48. and Duncan v. Louisiana
    Search
  49. Kent v. United
    Search
  50. and Bloom v. Illinois
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial