Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Lemon Vs. Kurtzman

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 28, 1971

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

67 entries 10 linked 57 unlinked
Show
  1. Sherbert Vs. Verner US Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1963
  2. Meyer Vs. Nebraska US Supreme Court · Jun 04, 1923
  3. Flast Vs. Cohen US Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1968
  4. Zorach Vs. Clauson US Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1952
  5. Cooper Vs. Aaron US Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1958
  6. Faubus, Vs. Aaron US Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1959
  7. Bradfield Vs. Roberts US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1899
  8. Tilton Vs. Richardson US Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1971
  9. Engel Vs. Vitale US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1962
  10. Torcaso Vs. Watkins US Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1961
  11. U.S. 602 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Lemon v. Kurtzman
    Search
  12. U.S. 602 (1971) Lemon v. Kurtzman
    Search
  13. Pp. 403 U. S. 622 -624. (d) Unlike the tax exemption for places of religious worship, upheld in Walz v. Tax
    Search
  14. to challenge the Act, 310 F.Supp. 42. The organizational plaintiffs appellants were denied standing under Flast v. Cohen
    Search
  15. the Establishment nor the Free Exercise Clause, Chief Judge Hastie dissenting. We reverse. II In Everson v. Board
    Search
  16. Walz v. Tax
    Search
  17. second, its principal or primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion, Board of Education v. Allen
    Search
  18. the statutes in each State involves excessive entanglement between government and religion. III In Walz v. Tax
    Search
  19. possible in an absolute sense. Some relationship between government and religious organizations is inevitable. Zorach v. Clauson
    Search
  20. in Walz v. Tax
    Search
  21. out that state aid was provided to the student and his parents -- not to the church-related school. Board of Education v. Allen
    Search
  22. Everson v. Board
    Search
  23. of Education, supra, at 330 U. S. 18 . In Walz v. Tax
    Search
  24. Rev. 1680, 1692 (1969). The potential divisiveness of such conflict is a threat to the normal political process. Walz v. Tax
    Search
  25. Commission, supra, at 397 U. S. 695 (separate opinion of HARLAN, J.). See also Board of Education v. Allen
    Search
  26. Abington School District v. Schempp
    Search
  27. Together with No. 569, Earley et al. v. DiCenso
    Search
  28. et al., and No. 570, Robinson, Commissioner of Education of Rhode Island, et al. v. DiCenso
    Search
  29. was noted, and the cases were set for oral argument with the other school cases. 400 U.S. 901. In Walz v. Tax
    Search
  30. right of dissenters to substitute their parochial schools for public schools was sustained by the Court in Pierce v. Society
    Search
  31. schools puts those schools under disabilities with which they were not previously burdened. For, as we held in Cooper v. Aaron
    Search
  32. on state governments come into play. Thus, Arkansas, as part of its attempt to avoid the consequences of Brown v. Board
    Search
  33. sent the funds instead to private schools. That state action was held to violate the Equal Protection Clause. Aaron v. McKinley
    Search
  34. F.Supp. 944, 952. We affirmed, sub nom. Faubus v. Aaron
    Search
  35. U. S. 197 . Louisiana tried a like tactic, and it too was invalidated. Poindexter v. Louisiana
    Search
  36. a hospital though it is run by a religious order, provided it is open to people of all races and creeds. Bradfield v. Roberts
    Search
  37. is not indulging in religious instruction or guidance or indoctrination. As Mr. Justice Jackson said in Everson v. Board
    Search
  38. there will be vast governmental suppression, surveillance, or meddling in church affairs. As I indicated in Tilton v. Richardson
    Search
  39. decided this day, school prayers, the daily routine of parochial schools, must go if our decision in Engel v. Vitale
    Search
  40. L. Boettner, Roman Catholicism 375 (1962). Board of Education v. Allen
    Search
  41. the First Amendment, applicable to the States by virtue of the Fourteenth. We said in unequivocal words in Everson v. Board
    Search
  42. We reiterated the same idea in Zorach v. Clauson
    Search
  43. U. S. 306 , 343 U. S. 314 , and in McGowan v. Maryland
    Search
  44. U. S. 420 , 366 U. S. 443 , and in Torcaso v. Watkins
    Search
  45. U. S. 488 , 367 U. S. 493 . We repeated the same idea in McCollum v. Board
    Search
  46. And sophisticated attempts to avoid the Constitution are just as invalid as simple-minded ones. Lane v. Wilson
    Search
  47. No. 89, see ante, p. 403 U. S. 625 , while intimating no view as to the continuing vitality of Everson v. Board
    Search
  48. See Pierce v. Society
    Search
  49. public schools have without exception been stricken down as tools of the forbidden discrimination. See Griffin v. School
    Search
  50. Lee v. Macon
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial