Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Harris Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Aug 31, 1971

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 1 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Erwin US Supreme Court · Mar 08, 1893
  2. Harris v. United
    Search
  3. States - 404 U.S. 1232 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Harris v. United
    Search
  4. States, 404 U.S. 1232 (1971) Harris v. United
    Search
  5. of Appeals have previously denied similar applications, and their action is entitled to great deference. Reynolds v. United
    Search
  6. Accord, Sellers v. United
    Search
  7. States, 89 S.Ct. 36, 21 L.Ed.2d 64 (1968). While there is no automatic right to bail after convictions, Bowman v. United
    Search
  8. questions. See, e.g., Wolcher v. United
    Search
  9. lacking any relevant evidence as to a crucial element of the offense charged would violate due process. See Adderley v. Florida
    Search
  10. U. S. 39 , 385 U. S. 44 (1966). See also Johnson v. Florida
    Search
  11. Thompson v. Louisville
    Search
  12. required to support an inference of knowledge in narcotics offenses is not always an easy question. Cf. Turner v. United
    Search
  13. Leary v. United
    Search
  14. Justices have granted bail pending appeal based in part on similar claims of failure of proof. See, e.g., Brussel v. United
    Search
  15. these circumstances, the admissibility of this declaration as a hearsay exception is not free from doubt. Cf. Fiswick v. United
    Search
  16. and that courts have held that secondary evidence may be used without further ado in such a case, see, e.g., Hartzell v. United
    Search
  17. Leigh v. United
    Search
  18. Rehman v. California
    Search
  19. must be made than is apparent from this record to justify a denial of bail on that ground. See, e.g., United States v. Erwin
    Search
  20. of the differing approaches used by the Ninth and the Fifth Circuits to justify extended border searches. Harris v. United
    Search
  21. States, 400 U. S. 1211 (1970). The full Court, however, denied certiorari. Harris v. United
    Search
  22. applicant's Fourth Amendment claims have not been considered in the decision to grant this application. Cf. Drifka v. Brainard
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Harris v. United
    Search
  24. Reynolds v. United
    Search
  25. Bowman v. United
    Search
  26. Wolcher v. United
    Search
  27. See Adderley v. Florida
    Search
  28. Johnson v. Florida
    Search
  29. Cf. Turner v. United
    Search
  30. Brussel v. United
    Search
  31. Cf. Fiswick v. United
    Search
  32. Hartzell v. United
    Search
  33. Rehman v. California
    Search
  34. Cf. Drifka v. Brainard
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial