Citation network
Schilb Vs. Kuebel
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 20, 1971
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 357 (1971) U.S. Supreme Court Schilb v. KuebelSearch
-
U.S. 357 (1971) Schilb v. KuebelSearch
-
the same, other factors afford a rational basis for making no charge under the full amount deposit system. Rinaldi v. YeagerSearch
-
imposed on all -- guilty and innocent alike -- who seek its Page 404 U. S. 358 benefit. Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
that entire amount even though the accused fully satisfied the conditions of the bond. See People ex rel. Gendron v. IngramSearch
-
Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
McDonald v. BoardSearch
-
the statutory discrimination, McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
see Page 404 U. S. 365 United States v. MarylandSearch
-
n. 30 (1970) (opinion of BRENNAN, WHITE, and MARSHALL, JJ.). Bail, of course, is basic to our system of law, Stack v. BoyleSearch
-
Herzog v. UnitedSearch
-
of excessive bail has been assumed to have application to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment. Pilkinton v. CircuitSearch
-
Robinson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 471 , 397 U. S. 483 -487 (1970). See Richardson v. BelcherSearch
-
lacking in rationality to the point where equal protection considerations require that they be struck down. Rinaldi v. YeagerSearch
-
and rested on no administrative convenience. B. The poor man-affluent man argument centers, of course, in Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
Williams v. IllinoisSearch
-
Illinois rule against the imposition of costs of prosecution upon an acquitted or discharged criminal defendant, Wells v. McCullockSearch
-
only upon the convicted defendant. v. FinallySearch
-
Cf. Stack v. BoyleSearch
-
do not reach the question of equal protection, but rest my decision on the issue stirred, but not decided, in Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
of him. Imposition of costs upon individuals who have been acquitted has long been eschewed by our courts. E.g., State v. BrooksSearch
-
Biester v. StateSearch
-
Childers v. CommonwealthSearch
-
is such uniform condemnation of a practice as onerous as the imposition of costs upon acquitted defendants, cf. Leland v. OregonSearch
-
protection questions. For a statute fair on its face may be administered in an invidious way. As stated in Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
the personal recognizance program was as high as the cost of administering the bail program. Cf. Richardson v. BelcherSearch
-
United States v. MarylandSearch
-
Metropolis Theatre Co. v. CitySearch
-
As this Court said in Rinaldi v. YeagerSearch
-
alone amounts to a violation of the Equal Protection and the Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Schilb v. KuebelSearch
-
Gendron v. IngramSearch
-
the Fourteenth Amendment. Pilkinton v. CircuitSearch
-
Robinson v. CaliforniaSearch
-
See Richardson v. BelcherSearch
-
Griffin v. IllinoisSearch
-
Wells v. McCullockSearch
-
E.g., State v. BrooksSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial