Citation network
BaldwIn Vs. New York
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1970
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Baldwin V. NewSearch
-
York - 399 U.S. 117 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Baldwin V. NewSearch
-
YORK , 399 U.S. 117 (1970) 399 U.S. 117 Robert BALDWIN, Appellant, v. StateSearch
-
of NEW YORK. Johnny WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. StateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
June 22, 1970 Mr. Justice HARLAN, dissenting in No. 188, and concurring in the result in No. 927. In Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
Baldwin v. NewSearch
-
At Page 399 U.S. 117 , 118 the same time the Court holds in No. 927, Williams v. FloridaSearch
-
Given Malloy v. HoganSearch
-
the Sixth Amendment. See District of Columbia v. ClawansSearch
-
Schick v. UnitedSearch
-
Smith v. AlabamaSearch
-
United States v. WongSearch
-
Townsend v. SainSearch
-
U.S. 293 (1963), and Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
Cf. United States v. BrownSearch
-
U.S. 117 , 125 of historical understanding and the adaptation of purpose to contemporary circumstances. Cf. Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Olmstead v. UnitedSearch
-
Welsh v. UnitedSearch
-
Thompson v. UtahSearch
-
See Patton v. UnitedSearch
-
Maxwell v. DowSearch
-
Rassmussen v. UnitedSearch
-
Andres v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 333 U.S. 740, 748 , 884 (1948) (unanimity).13 As Mr. Justice Frankfurter stated in Gore v. UnitedSearch
-
Moragne v. StatesSearch
-
Marine Lines, 398 U.S. 375, 403 Page 399 U.S. 117 , 128 (1970). See also Helvering v. HallockSearch
-
Boys Markets v. RetailSearch
-
Burnet v. CoronadoSearch
-
Moragne v. StatesSearch
-
Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. 244, 256 , 1037 ( 1969) (dissenting opinion)) unworkable, or no longer suited to contemporary life (e.g., Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 389 U.S. 347, 360 , 516 (1967) (concurring opinion)). See also Welsh v. UnitedSearch
-
Marchetti v. UnitedSearch
-
Warden, Md. Penitentiary v. HaydenSearch
-
Swift & Co. v. WickhamSearch
-
James v. UnitedSearch
-
Palko v. ConnecticutSearch
-
In Ker v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial