Citation network
Turner Vs. Fouche
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 19, 1970
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 346 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Turner v. FoucheSearch
-
U.S. 346 (1970) Turner v. FoucheSearch
-
as the scheme is not inherently unfair, or necessarily incapable of administration without regard to race. Carter v. JurSearch
-
Page 396 U. S. 348 MR. JUSTICE STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court. This case, a companion to Carter v. JurySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
revealed in the record of this case be eliminated. Such arguments are similar to those advanced in Carter v. JurySearch
-
F.Supp. at 652. Subsequent to the ruling of the District Court, this Court decided Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
Free School District, 395 U. S. 621 , and Cipriano v. CitySearch
-
Stokes v. FortsonSearch
-
a plan that would allow those Negroes who wanted to transfer to a desegregated school the opportunity to do so. Turner v. GoolsbySearch
-
Georgia has used the voter registration lists, rather than the books of the tax receiver, since our decision in Whitus v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSearch
-
U. S. 89 , 295 U. S. 92 -95, and see Dusch v. DavisSearch
-
Sailors v. BoardSearch
-
to whom it has entrusted the administration of the challenged constitutional and statutory provisions. Rorick v. BoardSearch
-
City of Cleveland v. UnitedSearch
-
of the unconstitutionality of the result obtained by the use of a statute not attacked as unconstitutional. Louisiana v. UnitedSearch
-
Query v. UnitedSearch
-
was improperly convened because of the insubstantiality of the appellants' challenge to the Georgia laws. Swift & Co. v. WickhamSearch
-
California Water Service Co. v. CitySearch
-
it related to the appellants' claim that Georgia's school board selection procedure was unlawful on its face. Flast v. CohenSearch
-
United States v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Paul v. UnitedSearch
-
Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. JacobsenSearch
-
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. GarrettSearch
-
Ibid. Our decisions in Avery v. GeorgiaSearch
-
U. S. 559 , and Whitus v. GeorgiaSearch
-
down the white-and-yellow system, however varied in design, because of the obvious danger of abuse. See Williams v. GeorgiaSearch
-
See Sailors v. BoardSearch
-
See Jones v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Hill v. TexasSearch
-
Brown v. AllenSearch
-
Pierre v. LouisianaSearch
-
ground of educational inadequacy, however defined. See Gaston County v. UnitedSearch
-
Kotch v. BoardSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Turner v. FoucheSearch
-
Carter v. JurSearch
-
Carter v. JurySearch
-
Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
and Cipriano v. CitySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial