Citation network
Mills Vs. Electric Auto-lite Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 20, 1970
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Mills v. ElectricSearch
-
Auto-Lite Co. - 396 U.S. 375 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Mills v. ElectricSearch
-
Auto-Lite Co., 396 U.S. 375 (1970) Mills v. ElectricSearch
-
recognized by this Court in J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSearch
-
are able to make an informed choice when they are consulted on corporate transactions. Cf. Union Pac. R. Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
U. S. 321 , 321 U. S. 329 -330 (1944), quoting from Meredith v. WinterSearch
-
as rendering the contract merely voidable at the option of the innocent party. See, e.g., Greater Iowa Corp. v. McLendonSearch
-
Royal Air Properties, Inc. v. SmithSearch
-
Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. BellancaSearch
-
Kaminsky v. AbramsSearch
-
Green v. BrownSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
aside only if a court of equity concludes, from all the circumstances, that it would be equitable to do so. Cf. SEC v. NationalSearch
-
to an interim award of litigation expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees. Cf. Highway Truck Drivers Local 107 v. CohenSearch
-
Smolowe v. DelendoSearch
-
which have been held to preclude an award of attorneys' fees in a suit for trademark infringement. Fleischmann Corp. v. MaierSearch
-
Act of 1934 a purpose to circumscribe the courts' power to grant appropriate remedies. Cf. Bakery Workers Union v. RatnerSearch
-
usually on behalf of a class, that benefits a group of others in the same manner as himself. See Fleischmann Corp. v. MaierSearch
-
Sprague v. TiconicSearch
-
A leading case is Bosch v. MeekerSearch
-
petitioners have rendered a substantial service to the corporation and its shareholders. Cf. Bakery Workers Union v. RatnerSearch
-
elimination of petitioners' rights thereunder, we will not consider the question in these circumstances. United States v. AmericanSearch
-
Morley Constr. Co. v. MarylandSearch
-
is pure conjecture to assume that the fairness of the proposal will always be determinative of their vote. Cf. Wirtz v. HotelSearch
-
Cf. List v. FashionSearch
-
General Time Corp. v. TalleySearch
-
such that a reasonable stockholder would have approved the transaction after more careful analysis. See also Swanson v. AmericanSearch
-
proxy solicitation might be sufficiently related to the merger to satisfy the causation requirement, see Laurenzano v. EinbenderSearch
-
Swanson v. AmericanSearch
-
Eagle v. HorvathSearch
-
Globus, Inc. v. JaroffSearch
-
a Corporate Right of Action Against Directors Under SEC Rule 105, 114 U.Pa.L.Rev. 578, 582 (1966). But see Hoover v. AllenSearch
-
Barnett v. AnacondaSearch
-
Robbins v. BannerSearch
-
See Eastside Church of Christ v. NationalSearch
-
Goldstein v. GroesbeckSearch
-
See Trustees v. GreenoughSearch
-
Central R. R. & Banking Co. v. PettusSearch
-
Holthusen v. EdwardSearch
-
Runswick v. FloorSearch
-
Hartman v. OatmanSearch
-
Greenough v. CoeurSearch
-
Riverside Oil & Refining Co. v. LynchSearch
-
Allen v. ChaseSearch
-
Nat. Bank, 180 Misc. 259, 40 N.Y.S.2d 245 (Sup.Ct.1943), sequel to Allen v. ChaseSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Mills v. ElectricSearch
-
Cf. Union Pac. R. Co. v. ChicagoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial