Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Icc

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 02, 1970

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

60 entries 1 linked 59 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Lowden US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1939
  2. U.S. 491 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ICC
    Search
  3. U.S. 491 (1970) United States v. Interstate
    Search
  4. County of Marin v. United
    Search
  5. McLean Trucking Co. v. United
    Search
  6. Northern Pacific and Great Northern have long sought to merge into a single unified transportation system. In Pearsall v. Great
    Search
  7. consolidation of parallel and competing railroads. The next merger attempt was struck down in Northern Securities Co. v. United
    Search
  8. any transaction approved by the Commission is relieved of the operation of the antitrust laws. McLean Trucking Co. v. United
    Search
  9. as a whole also embodied concern for economy and efficiency in rail operations. See Railroad Commission of California v. Southern
    Search
  10. Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. Gulf
    Search
  11. Texas v. United
    Search
  12. mergers to combinations by which the strong rescue the halt and the lame. In New York Central Securities Corp. v. United
    Search
  13. underlying the 1920 enactment. We recognized in St. Joe Paper Co. v. Atlantic
    Search
  14. As recently as County of Marin v. United
    Search
  15. Emphasis added.) Schwabacher v. United
    Search
  16. was discussed comprehensively and dispositively in McLean Trucking Co. v. United
    Search
  17. on the enforcement of free competition in various phases of the business, cf. New York Central Securities Corp. v. United
    Search
  18. Id. at 321 U. S. 83 -88. (Footnotes omitted.) Accord, Minneapolis & St. L.R. Co. v. United
    Search
  19. Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. United
    Search
  20. Florida East Coast R. Co. v. United
    Search
  21. the appellant due process of law. What this Court said in Page 396 U. S. 521 Interstate Commerce Commission v. Jersey
    Search
  22. Id. at 322 U. S. 514 -515. Moreover, as this Court noted in United States v. Pierce
    Search
  23. to take further evidence on the question of each group of shareholders' contribution to the merger. Schwabacher v. United
    Search
  24. matter. Cf. O. C. Wiley & Sons v. United
    Search
  25. Walker v. United
    Search
  26. Interstate Investors, Inc. v. United
    Search
  27. New York Central Securities Corp. v. United
    Search
  28. has never been judicially determined, this Court has impliedly recognized it several times. In Northern Pacific R. Co. v. Boyd
    Search
  29. Id. at 228 U. S. 506 . In United States v. Northern
    Search
  30. District Court for the District of Columbia held the action barred by laches and dismissed the complaint. Landell v. Northern
    Search
  31. argues that, because the Act chartering Railroad is a law as much as it is a grant, see Oregon & California R. Co. v. United
    Search
  32. the Commission and makes the Commission's approval of the merger unlawful. Livingston relies upon Union Pacific R. Co. v. Mason
    Search
  33. Together with No. 38, Brundage et al. v. United
    Search
  34. States et al., No. 43, City of Auburn v. United
    Search
  35. States et al., and No. 44, Livingston Anti-Merger Committee v. Interstate
    Search
  36. The three-judge court decision is reported as United States v. United
    Search
  37. consolidations was presented to this Court by the Secretary of Agriculture in No. 31, O.T. 1943, McLean Trucking Co. v. United
    Search
  38. States 38, 40, and to the three-judge court in the Seaboard-Coast Line merger litigation, Florida East Coast R. Co. v. United
    Search
  39. merger of the Northern Lines under a plan similar to that held violative of the Sherman Act in Northern Securities Co. v. United
    Search
  40. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. ICC
    Search
  41. United States v. Interstate
    Search
  42. In Pearsall v. Great
    Search
  43. Northern Securities Co. v. United
    Search
  44. See Railroad Commission of California v. Southern
    Search
  45. In New York Central Securities Corp. v. United
    Search
  46. St. Joe Paper Co. v. Atlantic
    Search
  47. Schwabacher v. United
    Search
  48. Accord, Minneapolis & St. L.R. Co. v. United
    Search
  49. Florida East Coast R. Co. v. United
    Search
  50. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Jersey
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial