Citation network
Hadley Vs. Junior Coll. Dist.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 25, 1970
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
Coll. Dist. - 397 U.S. 50 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
Coll. Dist., 397 U.S. 50 (1970) Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
as practicable, will insure that equal numbers of voters can vote for proportionally equal numbers of officials. Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
as much weight, as far as is practicable, as that of any other voter in the junior college district. In Wesberry v. SandersSearch
-
statute which allowed glaring discrepancies among the populations in that State's congressional districts. In Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Guinn v. UnitedSearch
-
by the Fourteenth Amendment to have their votes given the same weight as that of other voters. Finally, in Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
that required that candidates be residents of certain districts that did not contain equal numbers of people. Dusch v. DavisSearch
-
the same number of people does not deny those people equal protection of the laws. Sailors v. BoardSearch
-
Fortson v. MorrisSearch
-
Lucas v. ColoradoSearch
-
school enumeration figures, rather than actual population figures, can be used as a basis of apportionment. Cf. Burns v. RichardsonSearch
-
rule of Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
have always been recognized as playing a legitimate part in the practice of politics. Four years later, in Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
at large may be required to be residents of particular areas that do not contain equal numbers of people, Dusch v. DavisSearch
-
denied outright to persons whose interest in the function performed by the agency is nonexistent or slight, cf. Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
Cipriano v. CitySearch
-
and allow members of an official body to be appointed, without any regard for the equal-population principle, Sailors v. BoardSearch
-
s public educational facilities were not expanding at a satisfactory rate, see Three Rivers Junior College District v. StatlerSearch
-
might be permissible in state legislative apportionment than in congressional districting. Compare Swann v. AdamsSearch
-
U. S. 440 (1967), with Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
U. S. 526 (1969), and Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
is being applied here with a rigidity that finds no justification in the considerations that gave it birth. Cf. Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
is relatively minor. Even more important, it is not an unexplained and unjustified deviation from equality, see Swann v. AdamsSearch
-
Cf. Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
In Wesberry v. SandersSearch
-
In Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Dusch v. DavisSearch
-
Sailors v. BoardSearch
-
Cf. Burns v. RichardsonSearch
-
of Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
Three Rivers Junior College District v. StatlerSearch
-
Compare Swann v. AdamsSearch
-
and Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
Cf. Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
WMCA, Inc. v. LomenzoSearch
-
Swann v. AdamsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial