Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Data Processing Svc. Orgs. Vs. Camp

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 03, 1970

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

43 entries 6 linked 37 unlinked
Show
  1. Barrows Vs. Jackson US Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1953
  2. Stark Vs. Wickard US Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1944
  3. Flast Vs. Cohen US Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1968
  4. Rusk Vs. Cort US Supreme Court · Apr 02, 1962
  5. Abbott Laboratories Vs. Gardner US Supreme Court · May 22, 1967
  6. Barlow Vs. Collins US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1970
    Relied / Followed
  7. U.S. 150 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Data Processing Svc. Orgs. v. Camp
    Search
  8. U.S. 150 (1970) Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp
    Search
  9. As we recently stated in Flast v. Cohen
    Search
  10. Those tests were based on prior decisions of this Court, such as Tennessee Power Co. v. TVA
    Search
  11. as well as economic, values. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conf. v. FPC
    Search
  12. Office of Communication of United Church of Christ v. FCC
    Search
  13. standing to raise issues concerning the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. Abington School District v. Schempp
    Search
  14. injured, FCC v. Sanders
    Search
  15. of course, resolve the question one way or another, save as the requirements of Article III dictate otherwise. Muskrat v. United
    Search
  16. business was allegedly protected by a valid city ordinance that protected it from unlawful competition. Chicago v. Atchison
    Search
  17. F. R. Co., Page 397 U. S. 155 357 U. S. 77 , 357 U. S. 83 -84. In that tradition was Hardin v. Kentucky
    Search
  18. The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held in Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp
    Search
  19. a) (1964 ed., Supp. IV). In Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro
    Search
  20. of that Act, and, in that case, as well as in others, ( see Rusk v. Cort
    Search
  21. There is no presumption against judicial review and in favor of administrative absolutism ( see Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner
    Search
  22. U. S. 140 ), unless that purpose is fairly discernible in the statutory scheme. Cf. Switchmen's Union v. National
    Search
  23. is a matter quite distinct from the problem of standing. Barlow v. Collins
    Search
  24. is inapplicable to the present case. See FCC v. Sanders
    Search
  25. Associated Industries v. Ickes
    Search
  26. We intimate no view, under the decisions rendered today here and in Barlow v. Collins
    Search
  27. supra, on the issue of standing involved in No. 835, National Association of Securities Dealers v. SEC
    Search
  28. and No. 843, Investment Company Institute v. Camp
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Data Processing Svc. Orgs. v. Camp
    Search
  30. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp
    Search
  31. Tennessee Power Co. v. TVA
    Search
  32. Scenic Hudson Preservation Conf. v. FPC
    Search
  33. the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. Abington School District v. Schempp
    Search
  34. FCC v. Sanders
    Search
  35. Muskrat v. United
    Search
  36. Chicago v. Atchison
    Search
  37. Hardin v. Kentucky
    Search
  38. Supp. IV). In Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro
    Search
  39. Cf. Switchmen's Union v. National
    Search
  40. See FCC v. Sanders
    Search
  41. National Association of Securities Dealers v. SEC
    Search
  42. Investment Company Institute v. Camp
    Search
  43. Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial