Citation network
Brady Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 04, 1970
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 397 U.S. 742 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970) Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
but by the development concerning his confederate. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Petitioner claims that United States v. JacksonSearch
-
courts below that petitioner's guilty plea was voluntary. Pp. 397 U. S. 745 -758. (a) Though United States v. JacksonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
advice by competent counsel, was intelligently made, and the fact that petitioner did not anticipate United States v. JacksonSearch
-
of Appeals was in error in not reaching a contrary result on the authority of this Court's decision in United States v. JacksonSearch
-
U. S. 570 (1968). We affirm. I In United States v. JacksonSearch
-
U.S. at 390 U. S. 583 . Cited in support of this statement, 390 U.S. at 390 U. S. 583 n. 25, was Laboy v. NewSearch
-
See Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
of Brady's plea can be determined only by considering all of the relevant circumstances surrounding it. Cf. Haynes v. WashingtonSearch
-
selected counts, to lesser included offenses, or to reduced charges. The Fifth Amendment does not reach so far. Bram v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. at 168 U. S. 542 -543. More recently, Malloy v. HoganSearch
-
impact of a promise of leniency could not be dissipated by the presence and advice of counsel, any more than Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
a) empowered the jury to impose the death penalty and that, nine years later, in United States v. JacksonSearch
-
of action. More particularly, absent misrepresentation or other impermissible conduct by state agents, cf. Von Moltke v. GilliesSearch
-
than was reasonably assumed at the time the plea was entered. The fact that Brady did not anticipate United States v. JacksonSearch
-
of guilt was truthful. Affirmed. MR. JUSTICE BLACK, while adhering to his belief that United States v. JacksonSearch
-
In McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
failure to comply with Rule 11 required that a defendant who had pleaded guilty be allowed to plead anew. In Halliday v. UnitedSearch
-
Machibroda v. UnitedSearch
-
Waley v. JohnstonSearch
-
Kercheval v. UnitedSearch
-
See Brookhart v. JanisSearch
-
Adams v. UnitedSearch
-
Patton v. UnitedSearch
-
without the assistance of counsel and without a valid waiver of the right to counsel. See Pennsylvania ex rel. Herman v. ClaudySearch
-
U. S. 471 (1945). Since Gideon v. WainwrightSearch
-
that a guilty plea to a felony charge entered without counsel and without a waiver of counsel is invalid. See White v. MarylandSearch
-
the charges against him and the possible consequences of his plea was at the heart of our recent decisions in McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, and Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 1 , 378 U. S. 7 (1964). See also Haynes v. WashingtonSearch
-
Wilson v. UnitedSearch
-
Shelton v. UnitedSearch
-
considered whether a guilty plea to avoid a possible death penalty is involuntary. See United States ex rel. Brown v. LaValleeSearch
-
United States v. ThomasSearch
-
Pindell v. UnitedSearch
-
McFarland v. UnitedSearch
-
Laboy v. NewSearch
-
Gilmore v. CaliforniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial