Citation network
Hellenic Lines Ltd. Vs. Rhoditis
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 08, 1970
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 306 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. RhoditisSearch
-
U.S. 306 (1970) Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. RhoditisSearch
-
In the totality of the circumstances of this case, which is factually distinguishable from Lauritzen v. LarsenSearch
-
writ of certiorari which we granted, 396 U.S. 1000, in light of the conflict between the decision below and Tsakonites v. TranspacificSearch
-
without any qualifications. In Lauritzen v. LarsenSearch
-
Moreover,the list of seven factors in Lauritzen was not intended as exhaustive. As held in Pavlou v. OceanSearch
-
Page 398 U. S. 310 Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSearch
-
with the substantial and continuing contacts that this alien owner has with this country. If, as stated in Bartholomew v. UniverseSearch
-
Bartholomew v. UniverseSearch
-
The language of 688 is, as Mr. Justice Jackson noted in Lauritzen v. LarsenSearch
-
U.S. at 345 U. S. 577 . This principle the Court reiterated in Romero v. InternationalSearch
-
U.S. at 358 U. S. 383 . This Court only recently applied this principle in McCulloch v. SociedadSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSearch
-
where recovery was had by resident alien seamen who were serving aboard foreign-flag vessels. See, e.g., Gambera v. BergotySearch
-
Gerradin v. UnitedSearch
-
Gambera v. BergotySearch
-
O'Neill v. CunardSearch
-
foreign registry as a wedge for displacing the law of the flag, see, e.g., Southern Cross Steamship Co. v. FiripisSearch
-
Pavlou v. OceanSearch
-
Voyiatzis v. NationalSearch
-
U.S. at 345 U. S. 587 , was prefaced by citation and discussion of Skiriotes v. FloridaSearch
-
U. S. 69 (1941), and Steele v. BulovaSearch
-
it can, consistently with the requirements of due process, exercise legislative jurisdiction. See, e.g., Home Ins. Co. v. DickSearch
-
Watson v. EmployersSearch
-
liability could not be avoided simply by performing the forbidden acts in a foreign territory. Cf. Continental Ore Co. v. UnionSearch
-
United States v. SisalSearch
-
The Second Circuit quite properly relied on the beneficial ownership of the ship to permit recovery in Bartholomew v. UniverseSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. RhoditisSearch
-
and Tsakonites v. TranspacificSearch
-
In Lauritzen v. LarsenSearch
-
Romero v. InternationalSearch
-
McCulloch v. SociedadSearch
-
Gambera v. BergotySearch
-
O'Neill v. CunardSearch
-
Southern Cross Steamship Co. v. FiripisSearch
-
of Skiriotes v. FloridaSearch
-
and Steele v. BulovaSearch
-
Home Ins. Co. v. DickSearch
-
Cf. Continental Ore Co. v. UnionSearch
-
Bridges v. WixonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial