Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Atlantic Coast L. R. Co. Vs. Engineers

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 08, 1970

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

54 entries 2 linked 52 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Hutcheson US Supreme Court · Feb 03, 1941
  2. United Mine Workers Vs. Gibbs US Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1966
  3. U.S. 281 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Atlantic Coast L. R. Co. v. Engineers
    Search
  4. U.S. 281 (1970) Atlantic Coast L. R. Co. v. Brotherhood
    Search
  5. Act were applicable. ACL then obtained an injunction from a Florida court. After the decision in Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville
    Search
  6. Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Richman
    Search
  7. in this dispute until two years later, in 1969, after this Court's decision in Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville
    Search
  8. Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Gas
    Search
  9. order to the parties or prohibiting utilization of the results of a completed state proceeding. Oklahoma Packing Co. v. Gas
    Search
  10. Hill v. Martin
    Search
  11. abor activity which is within the Clayton Act is 'immunized trade union activities.' United States v. Hutcheson
    Search
  12. of Defendants' activities as 'secondary' does not alter this state of affairs. See Brotherhood of R. R. Trainmen v. Jacksonville
    Search
  13. for the Page 398 U. S. 295 same reason that the state court is. Cf. Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Richman
    Search
  14. the railroad could probably have based its federal case on the pendent state law claims as well, United Mine Workers v. Gibbs
    Search
  15. claims to the state court, it was also free to restrict the state complaint to state grounds alone. Cf. England v. Louisiana
    Search
  16. case, and neither court was free to prevent either party from simultaneously pursuing claims in both courts. Kline v. Page
    Search
  17. Donovan v. Dallas
    Search
  18. and might possibly, in certain emergency circumstances, seek such relief from this Court as well. Cf. Natural Gas Co. v. Public
    Search
  19. United States v. Moscow
    Search
  20. employees not to handle any FEC cars. The initial development of the controversy is chronicled in Railway Clerks v. Florida
    Search
  21. E. C. R. Co., 384 U. S. 238 (1966). See also Railroad Trainmen v. Atlantic
    Search
  22. Florida E.C. R. Co. v. Railroad
    Search
  23. See the historical discussion of the origin of the 1793 statute in Toucey v. N.Y
    Search
  24. the Court's opinion on the understanding that its holding implies no retreat from Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville
    Search
  25. Nor do I dispute the Court's holding, on the basis of Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Richman
    Search
  26. et seq., are now free to engage in self-help. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Baltimore
    Search
  27. the responding ACL employees are a part of the FEC-BLE major dispute. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Florida
    Search
  28. and in making common cause with the striking FEC engineers is similarly present. Brotherhood of R.R. Trainmen v. Atlantic
    Search
  29. U. S. 299 to the conduct of the defendants here involved. See Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Florida
    Search
  30. Brotherhood of R. R. Trainmen v. Atlantic
    Search
  31. of the order is supported by the fact that the District Judge relied upon Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Baltimore
    Search
  32. therefore, does not deprive this Court of jurisdiction to enter the injunction in this instance. Capital Service, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  33. App. 195-196. Page 398 U. S. 301 The District Judge's reliance upon Capital Service, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  34. and United Indus. Workers of the Seafarers Int'l Union v. Board
    Search
  35. injunction and during oral argument in the District Court, BLE relied extensively upon Capital Service, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  36. supra, and United Indus. Workers of the Seafarers Int'l Union v. Board
    Search
  37. U.S. Supreme Court Atlantic Coast L. R. Co. v. Engineers
    Search
  38. Atlantic Coast L. R. Co. v. Brotherhood
    Search
  39. Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville
    Search
  40. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville
    Search
  41. See Brotherhood of R. R. Trainmen v. Jacksonville
    Search
  42. Cf. Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Richman
    Search
  43. Cf. England v. Louisiana
    Search
  44. Kline v. Page
    Search
  45. Donovan v. Dallas
    Search
  46. Cf. Natural Gas Co. v. Public
    Search
  47. Railway Clerks v. Florida
    Search
  48. Railroad Trainmen v. Atlantic
    Search
  49. Toucey v. N.Y
    Search
  50. of Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Richman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial