Citation network
Evans Vs. Cornman
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1970
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 419 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court Evans v. CornmanSearch
-
U.S. 419 (1970) Evans v. CornmanSearch
-
holding that to deny appellees the right to vote was to deny them the equal protection of the laws. Cornman v. DawsonSearch
-
question, for another 15 years. In 1963, however, in a case involving residents of another federal enclave, Royer v. BoardSearch
-
was specifically rejected by this Court in Howard v. CommissionersSearch
-
Lassiter v. NorthamptonSearch
-
Harper v. VirginiaSearch
-
Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
as the citizen's link to his laws and government, is protective of all fundamental rights and privileges. See Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
be sufficiently compelling to justify limitations on the suffrage, at least with regard to some elections. See Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Cipriano v. CitySearch
-
Page 398 U. S. 423 State may not dilute a person's vote to give weight to other interests, see, e.g., Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
U. S. 533 (1964), and a lesser rule could hardly be applicable to a complete denial of the vote. See Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
to Congress. Appellants cite decisions dating back to Opinion of the Justices, 42 Mass. 580 (1841), and Sinks v. ReeseSearch
-
and Congress could restrict as well as extend the powers of the States within their bounds, see Offutt Housing Co. v. SarpySearch
-
to exclude from the polls all persons living on tax exempt property, and it could not constitutionally do so. Cipriano v. CitySearch
-
Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
the Maryland Court of Appeals, there are a number of other state court rulings to the same effect. See, e.g., Herken v. GlynnSearch
-
Arledge v. MabrySearch
-
McMahon v. PolkSearch
-
Lyle v. WilettSearch
-
there is a contrary line of recent state decisions granting enclave residents the right to vote. See Arapajolu v. McMenaminSearch
-
Rothfels v. SouthworthSearch
-
Adams v. LondereeSearch
-
on the enclave, but no instance of a practical effect on appellees is cited. See also Chicago & Pacific R. Co. v. McGlinnSearch
-
Stewart & Co. v. SadrakulaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Evans v. CornmanSearch
-
Cornman v. DawsonSearch
-
Royer v. BoardSearch
-
Williams v. RhodesSearch
-
See Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
and Sinks v. ReeseSearch
-
Offutt Housing Co. v. SarpySearch
-
Kramer v. UnionSearch
-
Herken v. GlynnSearch
-
Lyle v. WilettSearch
-
See Arapajolu v. McMenaminSearch
-
Chicago & Pacific R. Co. v. McGlinnSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial