Citation network
North Carolina Vs. Alford
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 23, 1970
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 25 (1970) U.S. Supreme Court North Carolina v. AlfordSearch
-
U.S. 25 (1970) North Carolina v. AlfordSearch
-
within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment because it was entered to avoid the possibility of the death penalty. Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 397 U. S. 742 . P. 400 U. S. 31 . (b) Hudson v. UnitedSearch
-
involuntarily. 405 F.2d 340 (1968). In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied heavily on United States v. JacksonSearch
-
We vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case for further proceedings. We held in Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant. See Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
Machibroda v. UnitedSearch
-
Kercheval v. UnitedSearch
-
defendant that he committed the particular acts claimed to constitute the crime charged in the indictment. See Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
Harris v. StateSearch
-
Tex.Cr.R. 126, 131, 172 S.W. 975, 977 (1915), require that trial judges reject such pleas. See, e.g., Hulsey v. UnitedSearch
-
Elksnis v. GilliganSearch
-
People v. MorrisonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
State v. RealiSearch
-
State v. LeybaSearch
-
State v. StacySearch
-
Tremblay v. OverholserSearch
-
McCoy v. UnitedSearch
-
State v. KaufmanSearch
-
Iowa 578, 580, 2 N.W. 275, 276 (1879) (dictum). Accord, e.g., Griffin v. UnitedSearch
-
Bruce v. UnitedSearch
-
City of Burbank v. GeneralSearch
-
State v. MartinezSearch
-
People v. HetheringtonSearch
-
Crossley v. TahashSearch
-
Commonwealth v. CottrellSearch
-
Pa. 177, 249 A.2d 294 (1969). Cf. United States ex rel. Brown v. LaValleeSearch
-
This Court has not confronted this precise issue, but prior decisions do yield relevant principles. In Lynch v. OverholserSearch
-
been accepted even though evidence before the judge indicated that there was a valid defense. The issue in Hudson v. UnitedSearch
-
the federal courts have uniformly followed this rule, even in cases involving moral turpitude. Bruce v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, at 343 n. 20, 379 F.2d at 120 n. 20 (dictum). See, e.g., Lott v. UnitedSearch
-
Sullivan v. UnitedSearch
-
Farnsworth v. ZerbstSearch
-
Pharr v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BaglioreSearch
-
the Constitution is concerned with the practical consequences, not the formal categorizations, of state law. See Smith v. BennettSearch
-
Jones v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 362 U. S. 257 , 362 U. S. 266 (1960). Cf. Kermarec v. CompagnieSearch
-
further provided a means by which the judge could test whether the plea was being intelligently entered, see McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
Relying on United States v. JacksonSearch
-
with this opinion. It is so ordered. MR. JUSTICE BLACK, while adhering to his belief that United States v. JacksonSearch
-
rather than death. The provision permitting guilty pleas in capital cases was repealed in 1969. See Parker v. NorthSearch
-
of the consequences of his plea of guilty and of the rights waived by the plea, no issues of substance under Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
valid plea containing a protestation of innocence, but to leave that decision to his sound discretion. See Maxwell v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. FoodSearch
-
F.2d 973 (CA9 1943), and on the other, as a query directed to the court to determine the defendant's guilt. State v. HopkinsSearch
-
Del. 306, 88 A. 473 (1913). See generally Lott v. UnitedSearch
-
what a defendant does admit when he enters a nolo plea in a way that will consistently fit all the cases. Hudson v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial