Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Sec Vs. National Securities, Inc.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 27, 1969

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

38 entries 1 linked 37 unlinked
Show
  1. Paul Vs. Virginia US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1869
  2. SEC v. National
    Search
  3. Securities, Inc. - 393 U.S. 453 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. National
    Search
  4. Securities, Inc., 393 U.S. 453 (1969) Securities and Exchange Commission v. National
    Search
  5. Page 393 U. S. 458 The McCarran-Ferguson Act was passed in reaction to this Court's decision in United States v. South-Eastern
    Search
  6. Prudential Insurance Co. v. Benjamin
    Search
  7. In context, however, it is relatively clear what problems Congress was dealing with. Under the regime of Paul v. Virginia
    Search
  8. that is what South-Eastern Underwriters was all about. The selling and advertising of policies, FTC v. National
    Search
  9. Casualty Co., 357 U. S. 560 (1958), and the licensing of companies and their agents, cf. Robertson v. California
    Search
  10. concerned with the type of state regulation that centers around the contract of insurance, the transaction which Paul v. Virginia
    Search
  11. to certain annuity contracts issued by insurance companies. SEC v. United
    Search
  12. explicitly rejected arguments based on the McCarran-Ferguson Act in a similar case of slightly earlier vintage. SEC v. Variable
    Search
  13. reason to emasculate the securities laws by forbidding remedies which might prove to be essential. Cf. J. I. Case Co. v. Borak
    Search
  14. Dasho v. Susquehanna
    Search
  15. Corp., 380 F.2d 262, 269 (opinion of Fairchild and Cummings, JJ.), cert. denied sub nom. Bard v. Dasho
    Search
  16. Vine v. Beneficial
    Search
  17. Ruckle v. Roto
    Search
  18. b) and Rule 10b-5. Cf. J. I. Case Co. v. Borak
    Search
  19. Ellis v. Carter
    Search
  20. at one time, the SEC itself was of the opinion that the Rule did not apply in cases of this sort. National Supply Co. v. Leland
    Search
  21. has chosen to adopt a very loose construction of the requirement, first enunciated by Judge Augustus Hand in Birnbaum v. Newport
    Search
  22. reaffirmed the vitality of the Birnbaum doctrine, with my Brother MARSHALL casting the deciding vote. O'Neill v. Maytag
    Search
  23. Fischman v. Raytheon
    Search
  24. U.S. Supreme Court SEC v. National
    Search
  25. Securities and Exchange Commission v. National
    Search
  26. United States v. South-Eastern
    Search
  27. of Paul v. Virginia
    Search
  28. FTC v. National
    Search
  29. Robertson v. California
    Search
  30. SEC v. United
    Search
  31. SEC v. Variable
    Search
  32. Cf. J. I. Case Co. v. Borak
    Search
  33. Bard v. Dasho
    Search
  34. Vine v. Beneficial
    Search
  35. Ruckle v. Roto
    Search
  36. National Supply Co. v. Leland
    Search
  37. Birnbaum v. Newport
    Search
  38. O'Neill v. Maytag
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial