Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Shuttlesworth Vs. City of Birmingham

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 10, 1969

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

43 entries 12 linked 31 unlinked
Show
  1. Thornhill Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1940
  2. Niemotko Vs. Maryland US Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1951
  3. Schneider Vs. State US Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1939
  4. Cantwell Vs. Connecticut US Supreme Court · May 20, 1940
  5. Largent Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Mar 08, 1943
  6. Marsh Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Jan 07, 1946
    Relied / Followed
  7. Tucker Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Jan 07, 1946
    Relied / Followed
  8. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. Vs. Wilson US Supreme Court · May 26, 1952
  9. Gelling Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Jun 02, 1952
  10. Freedman Vs. Maryland US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1965
    Relied / Followed
  11. National Fire Ins. Co. Vs. Thompson US Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1930
  12. Garner Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1961
  13. Shuttlesworth v. City
    Search
  14. of Birmingham - 394 U.S. 147 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Shuttlesworth v. City
    Search
  15. of Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147 (1969) Shuttlesworth v. City
    Search
  16. Cox v. New
    Search
  17. the First Amendment right of the petitioner and his organization, the petitioner's conviction may not stand. Cox v. New
    Search
  18. Staub v. Baxley
    Search
  19. picketing and parading may nonetheless constitute methods of expression, entitled to First Amendment protection. Cox v. Louisiana
    Search
  20. Edwards v. South
    Search
  21. Hague v. C.I
    Search
  22. Kunz v. New
    Search
  23. York, 340 U. S. 290 , 340 U. S. 293 -294. See also Saia v. New
    Search
  24. under the ordinance as it was written. The inquiry in every case must be that stated by Chief Justice Hughes in Cox v. New
    Search
  25. only facts developed in the Record in this case, but also those shown in the opinions in the related case of Walker v. City
    Search
  26. This case, therefore, is a far cry from Cox v. New
    Search
  27. See Lovell v. Griffin
    Search
  28. Saia v. New
    Search
  29. Superior Films, Inc. v. Department
    Search
  30. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Dallas
    Search
  31. Lovell v. Griffin
    Search
  32. other things, the availability of expeditious judicial review of the Commission's refusal of a permit. Cf. Poulos v. New
    Search
  33. Carroll v. President
    Search
  34. protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, see Stromberg v. California
    Search
  35. operate fully before the date set for the march. But such a suggestion ignores the principle established in Freedman v. Maryland
    Search
  36. months in advance would place a severe burden upon the exercise of his constitutionally protected rights. Cf. Williams v. Rhodes
    Search
  37. U.S. Supreme Court Shuttlesworth v. City
    Search
  38. of Walker v. City
    Search
  39. Cf. Poulos v. New
    Search
  40. Stromberg v. California
    Search
  41. Cf. Williams v. Rhodes
    Search
  42. Jones v. Opelika
    Search
  43. Cox v. Louisiana
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial