Citation network
Wells Vs. Rockefeller
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 07, 1969
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 542 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
U.S. 542 (1969) Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
The holding of Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
U. S. 543 MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. This case was argued with Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
that the statute violates the equal population principle of Wesberry v. SandersSearch
-
gerrymander. We hold that reversal of the District Court's judgment is compelled by our decision today in Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
districts were composed of groupings of whole counties. It is clear that our decision in Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
districts justified by the fact that these districts are constructed of entire counties. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
error in permitting the 1968 election to proceed under the plan despite its constitutional infirmities. See Kilgarlin v. HillSearch
-
Martin v. BushSearch
-
except to the extent that the opinion relies upon the Court's opinion in the Missouri redistricting cases, Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
or residence figures in order to recognize regional groupings within the State. See my dissent in Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
distrust of the legislative process is completely alien to established notions of judicial review. See Butler v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Davis v. DepartmentSearch
-
Wesberry v. SandersSearch
-
S. 552 county and regional lines. In doing so, the majority ignores the salutary warning to be found in Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
This opinion applies also to No. 30, Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
ante at 394 U. S. 531 . I have discussed in my dissenting opinion in Wesberry v. SandersSearch
-
and sticking at a trifle. It also seems arbitrary for the majority to discard the suggestion of Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Wells v. RockefellerSearch
-
of Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSearch
-
of Wesberry v. SandersSearch
-
See Kilgarlin v. HillSearch
-
Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
See Butler v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
of Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Swann v. AdamsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial