Citation network
Frazier Vs. Cupp
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 22, 1969
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 731 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Frazier v. CuppSearch
-
U.S. 731 (1969) Frazier v. CuppSearch
-
that his confession contravened the principles established by Escobedo v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 478 (1964), and Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
s case, the court's limiting instructions were sufficient to protect petitioner's constitutional rights. Douglas v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 415 (1965), and Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
in Escobedo, and Miranda, which was decided after petitioner's trial, is inapplicable under Johnson v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 415 , 380 U. S. 419 (1965), and that, as in Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
right of confrontation, guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. See Pointer v. TexasSearch
-
petitioner contends that Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
See Hopt v. UtahSearch
-
United States v. Socony-VacuumSearch
-
alleged to have occurred would have been sufficient to constitute reversible constitutional error. Cf. Miller v. PateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
further warnings, a written version was signed. Since petitioner was tried after this Court's decision in Escobedo v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 478 (1964), but before the decision in Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
U. S. 436 (1966), only the rule of the former case is directly applicable. Johnson v. NewSearch
-
U.S. at 384 U. S. 444 -445. But Miranda does not apply to this case. This Court, in Johnson v. NewSearch
-
Johnson v. NewSearch
-
this is, of course, a circumstance quite relevant to a finding of voluntariness. Davis v. NorthSearch
-
Clewis v. TexasSearch
-
of an otherwise lawful search. Under this Court's past decisions, they were clearly permitted to seize it. Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Frazier v. CuppSearch
-
Escobedo v. IllinoisSearch
-
and Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
and Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
Bruton v. UnitedSearch
-
the Constitution. See Pointer v. TexasSearch
-
Cf. Miller v. PateSearch
-
Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
Davis v. NorthSearch
-
Clewis v. TexasSearch
-
Harris v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial