Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Nlrb Vs. Wyman-gordon Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 23, 1969

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 1 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. Vs. Nlrb US Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1941
  2. NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon
    Search
  3. Co. - 394 U.S. 759 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon
    Search
  4. Co., 394 U.S. 759 (1969) National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon
    Search
  5. direction, which was part of the order directing that an election be held, is unquestionably valid. See, e.g., NLRB v. Waterman
    Search
  6. granted the Board a wide discretion to ensure the fair and free choice of bargaining representatives. See, e.g., NLRB v. Waterman
    Search
  7. in a similar manner. NLRB v. Hanes
    Search
  8. Hosiery Division, 384 F.2d 188, 191-192 (C.A.4th Cir.1967). See NLRB v. Rohlen
    Search
  9. NLRB v. Beech-Nut
    Search
  10. British Auto Parts, Inc. v. Page
    Search
  11. Nlrb V. Q-T
    Search
  12. had expressly approved the procedure the Board followed in adopting the Excelsior rule. Howell Refining Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  13. of the Excelsior rule without explicitly passing on the correctness of the method by which it was adopted. NLRB v. Hanes
    Search
  14. NLRB v. Rohlen
    Search
  15. more courts of appeals explicitly upheld the Excelsior rule and the procedure by which it was adopted, NLRB v. Beech-Nut
    Search
  16. British Auto Parts, Inc. v. NLRB
    Search
  17. A.3d Cir.1969), and the Fifth Circuit reaffirmed its earlier holding in Howell Refining Co., Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. Davis
    Search
  18. adjudication of particular cases without questioning the propriety of that procedure. He cites Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  19. NLRB v. Seven-Up
    Search
  20. Bottling Co., 344 U. S. 344 (1953), and Brooks v. NLRB
    Search
  21. in issuing its order, we are obliged to remand. He relies on SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  22. to decide, within its informed discretion, whether to proceed by rulemaking or adjudication. Our decision in SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  23. Administrative Procedure Act, even though the requirement was to be prospectively applied. See Great Northern R. Co. v. Sunburst
    Search
  24. of agency action established Page 394 U. S. 782 in our past decisions. This Court's landmark opinion in SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  25. the major reason the Board has given in support of its order is invalid, Chenery requires remand. See also Bell v. United
    Search
  26. Burlington Truck Lines v. United
    Search
  27. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon
    Search
  29. National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon
    Search
  30. NLRB v. Waterman
    Search
  31. NLRB v. Hanes
    Search
  32. (C.A.4th Cir.1967). See NLRB v. Rohlen
    Search
  33. Howell Refining Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  34. Howell Refining Co., Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. Davis
    Search
  35. Republic Aviation Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  36. and Brooks v. NLRB
    Search
  37. SEC v. Chenery
    Search
  38. See Great Northern R. Co. v. Sunburst
    Search
  39. Bell v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial