Citation network
O'Callahan Vs. Parker
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 02, 1969
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 258 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court O'Callahan v. ParkerSearch
-
U.S. 258 (1969) O'Callahan v. ParkerSearch
-
Those civil rights are the constitutional stakes in the present litigation. What we wrote in Toth v. QuarlesSearch
-
the genuine need for special military courts, has recognized their propriety in their appropriate sphere, e.g., Burns v. WilsonSearch
-
Toth v. QuarlesSearch
-
trial is that the trap of Article 134 may be avoided by a declaratory judgment proceeding or otherwise. See Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and the trial. Thus, discharged soldiers cannot be court-martialed for offenses committed while in service. Toth v. QuarlesSearch
-
U. S. 11 . Similarly, neither civilian employees of the Armed Forces overseas, McElroy v. GuagliardoSearch
-
nor civilian dependents of military personnel accompanying them overseas, Kinsella v. SingletonSearch
-
of this Court suggest any such interpretation. The Government emphasizes that these decisions -- especially Kinsella v. SingletonSearch
-
usually only senior enlisted personnel, i.e., noncommissioned officers, are selected. See United States v. CrawfordSearch
-
evidence and witnesses is, to a significant extent, dependent on the approval of the prosecution. United States v. HarveySearch
-
See Reid v. CovertSearch
-
court-martial jurisdiction is extensively reviewed in MR. JUSTICE BLACK's opinion for a plurality of the Court in Reid v. CovertSearch
-
Ex parte Mason, 105 U. S. 696 , 105 U. S. 701 . See also Smith v. WhitneySearch
-
How. 65. Johnson. v. SayreSearch
-
Id. at 158 U. S. 114 . And see Thompson v. WillinghamSearch
-
Writing for a plurality of the Court in Reid v. CovertSearch
-
Id. at 354 U. S. 22 -23. In Kinsella v. SingletonSearch
-
Grafton v. UnitedSearch
-
and not the Judiciary, to determine the appropriate subject matter jurisdiction of courts-martial. See Coleman v. TennesseeSearch
-
and noted that even this limiting principle was not strictly observed. Id. at 725, 730-732. And in Grafton v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. VoorheesSearch
-
United States v. GravittSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court O'Callahan v. ParkerSearch
-
See Dombrowski v. PfisterSearch
-
See United States v. CrawfordSearch
-
United States v. HarveySearch
-
Thompson v. WillinghamSearch
-
In Kinsella v. SingletonSearch
-
See Coleman v. TennesseeSearch
-
United States v. GravittSearch
-
Reid v. CovertSearch
-
Burns v. WilsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial