Citation network
BoykIn Vs. Alabama
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 02, 1969
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 238 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
U.S. 238 (1969) Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
Lee v. StateSearch
-
Douglas v. StateSearch
-
Duncan v. StateSearch
-
nothing remains but to give judgment and determine punishment. See Kercheval v. UnitedSearch
-
the prosecution spread on the record the prerequisites of a valid waiver is no constitutional innovation. In Carnley v. CochranSearch
-
waiver of a federal constitutional right in a proceeding is, of course, governed by federal standards. Douglas v. AlabamaSearch
-
self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment and applicable to the States by reason of the Fourteenth. Malloy v. HoganSearch
-
U. S. 1 . Second is the right to trial by jury. Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
U. S. 145 . Third is the right to confront one's accusers. Pointer v. TexasSearch
-
This is unlike Cardinale v. LouisianaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Woodard v. StateSearch
-
Rules of Criminal Procedure, which governs the duty of the trial judge before accepting a guilty plea. See McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
Due Process Clause, it must be 'an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.' Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
Missouri, State v. BlaylockSearch
-
New York, People v. SeatonSearch
-
Wisconsin, State v. BurkeSearch
-
Wis.2d 486, 494, 126 N.W.2d 91, 96 (1964), and Washington, Woods v. RhaySearch
-
West v. RundleSearch
-
Court itself has only very recently held application of Rule 11 to be unnecessary in the federal courts. See Halliday v. UnitedSearch
-
his state guilty plea was involuntary is entitled to a hearing as to the truth of those allegations. See, e.g., Waley v. JohnstonSearch
-
Machibroda v. UnitedSearch
-
to have a judgment of affirmance vacated and the case remanded for a state hearing on voluntariness. Cf. Jackson v. DennoSearch
-
record. In holding that this is a ground for reversal, the Court quotes copiously from McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
plainly out of keeping with a sequel case to McCarthy, decided only last month. For the Court held in Halliday v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
See Kercheval v. UnitedSearch
-
In Carnley v. CochranSearch
-
Douglas v. AlabamaSearch
-
of the Fourteenth. Malloy v. HoganSearch
-
Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
Pointer v. TexasSearch
-
Cardinale v. LouisianaSearch
-
See McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
and Washington, Woods v. RhaySearch
-
West v. RundleSearch
-
See Halliday v. UnitedSearch
-
Waley v. JohnstonSearch
-
Machibroda v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Jackson v. DennoSearch
-
McCarthy v. UnitedSearch
-
Halliday v. UnitedSearch
-
Hamilton v. AlabamaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial