Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Noyd Vs. Bond

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 16, 1969

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 3 linked 32 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Bryant US Supreme Court · May 05, 1884
  2. Township of Hillsborough Vs. Cromwell US Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1946
  3. Gusik Vs. Schilder US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1950
  4. U.S. 683 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court Noyd v. Bond
    Search
  5. U.S. 683 (1969) Noyd v. Bond
    Search
  6. to review the legality of petitioner's confinement at Cannon Air Force Base. The Court of Appeals, relying on Gusik v. Schilder
    Search
  7. by civilian courts until all available remedies within the military court system have been exhausted, Gusik v. Schilder
    Search
  8. Tenth Circuit, which reversed the District Court's grant of partial relief. Relying on this Court's decision in Gusik v. Schilder
    Search
  9. F.2d 441, 442-443. We granted certiorari to consider the propriety of the application of the rule of Gusik v. Schilder
    Search
  10. in civilian courts without making any effort to invoke the assistance of the courts within the military system. Gusik v. Schilder
    Search
  11. Military Appeals had held that it would, in appropriate cases, grant the relief petitioner now demands from us. Levy v. Resor
    Search
  12. in ancillary matters of this sort. We cannot agree. All of the reasons supporting this Court's decision in Gusik v. Schilder
    Search
  13. Phillips v. United
    Search
  14. martialed for refusing to obey orders, and so had not fully exhausted his remedies within the military system. Noyd v. McNamara
    Search
  15. to await the military's decision to convene a court-martial before seeking relief in the civilian courts. Hammond v. Lenfest
    Search
  16. In re Kelly, 401 F.2d 211 (C.A. 5th Cir.1968). Cf. Brown v. McNamara
    Search
  17. the Court of Military Appeals, see Brief in Support of Motion to Strike and Dismiss Petition, United States v. Frischholz
    Search
  18. a case which the Court of Military Appeals is not authorized to review under the governing statutes. Cf. United States v. Bevilacqua
    Search
  19. Petitioner contends that our decisions in Toth v. Quarles
    Search
  20. U. S. 1 (1957), and McElroy v. Guagliardo
    Search
  21. In Levy v. Resor
    Search
  22. not believe that petitioner may properly be required to exhaust a remedy which may not exist. Cf. Union Pacific R. Co. v. Weld
    Search
  23. U.S. Supreme Court Noyd v. Bond
    Search
  24. of Gusik v. Schilder
    Search
  25. Levy v. Resor
    Search
  26. Phillips v. United
    Search
  27. Noyd v. McNamara
    Search
  28. Hammond v. Lenfest
    Search
  29. Cir.1968). Cf. Brown v. McNamara
    Search
  30. Strike and Dismiss Petition, United States v. Frischholz
    Search
  31. Cf. United States v. Bevilacqua
    Search
  32. Toth v. Quarles
    Search
  33. and McElroy v. Guagliardo
    Search
  34. Cf. Union Pacific R. Co. v. Weld
    Search
  35. Reid v. Covert
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial